From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G7a8m-0002se-OW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:57:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6VFssrZ014739; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:54:54 GMT Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6VFqtKl001756 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:52:55 GMT Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id m19so515218nfc for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:52:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qJVl38eo4RUSvbM/c4AGPXPNiNE7mmGjSiOm7P0sioAKTTcUxZTcU5M3VxqqPG69BhxAnWmCYBClMWhQDcsmQ3TyhBAzz6flo3dJlnBE7NdDxkDGch2QOhf0GrpGgnpDuFbzeae3VzyC4MIBuJGblzW2vs4W2HYsc5L6u522LM0= Received: by 10.78.166.7 with SMTP id o7mr571963hue; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:52:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.160.9 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:52:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <558b73fb0607310852x2d6cb55cw91568899dc00a6da@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:52:53 -0400 From: "Michael Crute" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] netqmail and qmail In-Reply-To: <44CE11E6.3050406@mid.message-center.info> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <217e6afb0607302300j313a56fh66a9e7f1815a91e4@mail.gmail.com> <44CDF760.9060507@mid.message-center.info> <558b73fb0607310608j6482bbfbre28adef65f32099b@mail.gmail.com> <44CE11E6.3050406@mid.message-center.info> X-Archives-Salt: d8cfb028-75ad-438c-b140-165a41b80178 X-Archives-Hash: b14d5e39b0b74dc9680de1007103d02e On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar wrote: > Michael Crute wrote: > > On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> Suranga Kasthuriarachchi wrote: > > >> > Which is the best for organization mail server. > >> > >> NOT qmail - too many holes and not good performancewise. > > > I would beg to differ with the statement about security. Qmail is > > arguably THE MOST secure mail server > > (http://cr.yp.to/qmail/guarantee.html). > > Actually, it is NOT. DJB made this statement but he doesn't > stand to it. See http://home.pages.de/~mandree/qmail-bugs.html > for a quite big collection of bugs and RFC violations of qmail. > > To quote from that page: I'm not here to start a war over the merits of any one MTA... but I think it's worth reading DJBs rebuttal of the accusations made by Postfix's author. http://cr.yp.to/qmail/venema.html -- ________________________________ Michael E. Crute http://mike.crute.org I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I intended to be. --Douglas Adams -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list