Re: [gentoo-user] netqmail and qmail

["Michael Crute" <mcrute@gmail.com>]

On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar <listen@alexander.skwar.name> wrote:
> Michael Crute wrote:
> > On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar <listen@alexander.skwar.name> wrote:
> >> Suranga Kasthuriarachchi wrote:
>
> >> > Which is the best for organization mail server.
> >>
> >> NOT qmail - too many holes and not good performancewise.
>
> > I would beg to differ with the statement about security. Qmail is
> > arguably THE MOST secure mail server
> > (http://cr.yp.to/qmail/guarantee.html).
>
> Actually, it is NOT. DJB made this statement but he doesn't
> stand to it. See http://home.pages.de/~mandree/qmail-bugs.html
> for a quite big collection of bugs and RFC violations of qmail.
>
> To quote from that page:


I'm not here to start a war over the merits of any one MTA... but I
think it's worth reading DJBs rebuttal of the accusations made by
Postfix's author.

http://cr.yp.to/qmail/venema.html

-- 
________________________________
Michael E. Crute
http://mike.crute.org

I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended
up where I intended to be. --Douglas Adams
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list