From: Peter Humphrey <peter@prh.myzen.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Wastebin or trash?
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 08:55:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5584812.dTIG13Ksqt@peak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1524381.MqZeQ5WDYz@dell_xps>
On Thursday 08 Sep 2016 21:52:19 Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 08 Sep 2016 09:07:50 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Sorry gents, but this has nothing to do with IMAP: the phenomenon is
> > purely internal to KMail. Besides, I only have POP3 accounts (which I
> > suppose I could have said before but it didn't seem significant).
>
> Ahh! POP3 is just a bucket of messages. It does not have a concept of
> mailboxes/folders (not on the server anyway). Local folders and messages
> being dropped into them is a manual exercise by the user, or achieved by
> client filters. None of this is duplicated on the server.
>
> When you download a message and mark it for deletion, it is not not
> deleted until the server enters the UPDATE stage, when the client quits.
> The POP3 server does not move the deleted message anywhere, in another
> mailbox and it will not mirror any moves of messages into local folders
> on the client.
Yes, of course I know all that. It's why I see the problem lying at KMail's
door.
> > Alan is closest: it's a matter of string contents somewhere in the KMail
> > code. I just don't know whereabouts - nor do I want to fiddle around in
> > the guts of the program, which is quite fragile enough already. One
> > thing is being defined twice, or else it's defined once and only called
> > in one of the two places where it should be, the other being hard
> > coded.
> >
> > I've noticed both "trash" and "Wastebin" being used at different times
> > over the last year, which hints at instability of program design and
> > development management systems.
>
> Interestingly, my "Local Folders" contains a "trash" folder. I don't use
> local folders (all my accounts are IMAP4) so I haven't paid attention to
> this trash folder, or its name. I recall though that sometimes deleted
> messages end up there, if the IMAP account is offline when I happened to
> delete the message. From my failing memory I can attest this local
> folder has been always called "trash", but I could well be mistaken.
I wonder now whether it was worth starting this thread at all. :P
--
Rgds
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-09 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-07 15:45 [gentoo-user] Wastebin or trash? Peter Humphrey
2016-09-07 16:47 ` Andrew Lowe
2016-09-07 17:41 ` Mick
2016-09-07 17:53 ` Simon Thelen
2016-09-07 18:51 ` Alan McKinnon
2016-09-07 19:28 ` Mick
2016-09-08 8:07 ` Peter Humphrey
2016-09-08 20:52 ` Mick
2016-09-09 7:55 ` Peter Humphrey [this message]
2016-09-07 19:17 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5584812.dTIG13Ksqt@peak \
--to=peter@prh.myzen.co.uk \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox