From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-168417-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1E51384B4
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:43:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4433621C188;
	Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:43:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.3])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E9D21C01C
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:43:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=wstn.localnet)
	by smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <peter@prh.myzen.co.uk>)
	id 1ZxumV-0009Uv-2m
	for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:43:35 +0000
From: Peter Humphrey <peter@prh.myzen.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:43:34 +0000
Message-ID: <55679209.gKYcrLleyM@wstn>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.1.12-gentoo; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <2BE25BAB-1326-4F34-856D-DB87C08291BB@iki.fi>
References: <n22dge$mnp$1@ger.gmane.org> <20151115095928.GA1766@acm.fritz.box> <2BE25BAB-1326-4F34-856D-DB87C08291BB@iki.fi>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Originating-smarthost01b-IP: [82.69.80.10]
X-Archives-Salt: 0e4d8fd8-ac0d-4e38-8607-523af43b7542
X-Archives-Hash: 933c9924c26dd47d46a0022779b8df47

On Sunday 15 Nov 2015 12:22:39 Matti Nykyri wrote:
> > On Nov 15, 2015, at 11:59, Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> wrote:
--->8
> > Three days later.  I'm still getting this error message, but with a
> > nasty
> > twist in the tail.  emerge -puND @world reports (amongst others) the
> > 
> > following update:
> >    [ebuild   R    ] sys-apps/busybox-1.23.1-r1  USE="-pam*"
> > 
> > , and the error message I get on actually trying to start the update is
> > 
> >    !!! Digest verification failed:
> >    !!! /usr/portage/sys-apps/busybox/busybox-9999.ebuild
> >    !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
> >    !!! Got: 8493
> >    !!! Expected: 8580
> > 
> > .  Why is the build system looking at the digest for version 9999 when
> > it
> > should be rebuilding version 1.23.1-r1?
> 
> Well it's not. It just checks all the manifests and complains about
> errors. It doesn't affect the building of 1.23.1-r1.

I'm getting the same thing as Alan, and have been for several days.

> If I were you I'ld download the latest portage snapshot. That should take
> care of any remaining issues. Is your portage upto date?

My portage is sync'd daily, so it shouldn't need a whole new snapshot.

-- 
Rgds
Peter