From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5FC138CD0 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 15:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB22BE0982; Thu, 21 May 2015 15:29:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9E58E0968 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 15:29:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE15B20E0B for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 11:29:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 21 May 2015 11:29:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=pHR36McfN0zVCeh 06UtEezghUeI=; b=nm80oohJYskXb6k5taZMZDo9CrbUM1lg+4aYi5hd+VHa37R FCQ3yOy3jydpF88itGGMP6n6BHuQdByYdB976gjeMW3JdHQlc0sCEUu1Thg2eg54 sqDF0DG2lrAkfp/J51Y4UuB0CAYl43UozK0iiuAI9nQLUITy9h74LzZQoSk8= X-Sasl-enc: 5cipmEWQQf0eId3fXzxB8kV9WdLiS7Op17Y/2ChamCnq 1432222162 Received: from [35.2.255.2] (unknown [35.2.255.2]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AE044C00011 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 11:29:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <555DF9D2.7040608@alectenharmsel.com> Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 11:29:22 -0400 From: Alec Ten Harmsel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [~and64] Headsup for google-chrome users References: <555DF275.2030805@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <555DF275.2030805@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 7239fc5a-43dc-4fc0-81d3-51a10dd57081 X-Archives-Hash: 7e6d22b8681978f89d335b3d29e96744 On 05/21/15 10:57, Dale wrote: > walt wrote: >> I just wasted some time figuring out this mess: >> >> I just updated google-chrome, which printed this confusing warning message: >> >> "CONFIG_USED_NS not seen when it should be" >> >> First, there's a typo: it should read "CONFIG_USER_NS" >> ^ >> >> Then, after I figured out that CONFIG_USER_NS is a kernel config item, >> requiring reinstallation of my kernel, I wasted more time figuring out >> (for the n'th time) that you shouldn't just change a single kernel config >> item and do "make" because that shortcut can break important things. >> >> No, you should do "make clean" first, and then do "make" etc. > Doesn't "make clean" clear out your config? I've changed one thing > before and just run "make" and it work just fine. > > Dale > > :-) :-) > No, "make clean" does not clear your config. It depends on what you change - I guess their Makefiles/Kconfig doesn't specify all the dependencies for CONFIG_USER_NS. If you're on a decent machine, the kernel builds pretty quick anyways, and a clean build will always be correct. Alec