From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C80138CD0 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 10:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C87F8E094C; Tue, 19 May 2015 10:14:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE026E08FF for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 10:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477D220C3E for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 06:14:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 19 May 2015 06:14:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=dNQLKCxSMMX0xlS 3Up5I8JdLtAw=; b=uLTxI2Fn+m5cIpruJnDkM3vg2MW5OYtKL5hQXDNO6eAZlN9 YWx7vJrSx5SZj5O9gcSMaqcXK7oiEMBLe/JTRJKlOLhLvDJMulWzGld+UzaA+Ulm jbFhCZCUyruEK/U1Pz1qL30ndnIIj89K3fwdJzcxKStEcJSfmT7VKVGoo7S4= X-Sasl-enc: 55W9uPfIq66XWLk2iYoGI80kYjI22z7wxprb0w9ZJOPf 1432030476 Received: from [192.168.0.3] (unknown [68.42.214.119]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0202868015B for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 06:14:35 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <555B0D0B.2040903@alectenharmsel.com> Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 06:14:35 -0400 From: Alec Ten Harmsel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Recommendations for WLAN-AP? References: <20150427203755.391612d2@hal9000.localdomain> <55442E90.4050606@googlemail.com> <20150502181723.5e039826@hal9000.localdomain> <20150519004703.660f1e71@hal9000.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20150519004703.660f1e71@hal9000.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1ff112a0-7311-4593-96aa-7b00e2c106fe X-Archives-Hash: bc05540ac467bae874bee36681f988e2 On 05/18/2015 06:47 PM, wabenbau@gmail.com wrote: > Paul Tobias wrote: > >> On 2 May 2015 at 17:17, wrote: >> >>> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >>> >>>> tplink archer series? >>>> >>>> can cope with 20 laptops at the same time easily and is not too >>>> expensiv. >>> Thanks Volker. I will have a look at it. >>> >>> -- >>> Regards >>> wabe >>> >>> >> Hi wabe, did you decide yet? You might find this article useful: >> http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015/03/from-the-wirecutter-the-best-wi-fi-router-for-most-people-anyway/ >> >> Before that article came out, I also arrived at the same conclusion: >> the TP-Link Archer C7 v2 is the best for me. My requirements also >> included OpenWRT support. > Sorry for my late response, but I was on a holiday trip till last night. > > I never thought about using OpenWRT before I read your post, but I > wish I had. I already bought two ZyXEL NWA1123-AC. Unfortunately it > seems not possible to run OpenWRT on these devices. > > I will call the dealer tomorrow. I hope that it is possible to exchange > the devices because I still have not opened the packagings. > > -- > Regards > wabe > I'm a little late to the conversation, but my roommates and I use a $20 TP-LINK with DD-WRT as an AP because it has better wireless than my $100 Netgear router. The routing part of the TP-LINK isn't nearly as good (chokes on more than 10 devices), but the Netgear for routing with the TP-LINK for an AP is a perfect combo. Alec