From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-164253-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B093138CCE for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 17 May 2015 06:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ECCE4E095D; Sun, 17 May 2015 06:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8B0FE0854 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 17 May 2015 06:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicmx19 with SMTP id mx19so66488367wic.0 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 16 May 2015 23:10:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:attach; bh=+FAGKbOqRwfkbngbZMas9++5otDcj8diKoOuyi33k8w=; b=nMujVYBNCvYPymM0d4wKSVR5SGZ47VfMDlQH1H3ApfrkfBCH2A7jME94qrbi8EeL3g lLcGp3r80G3zQxsXPoftVP9tsThePqPBJhS2/LulO/ZSgtjsibc2CpC8NiGLoVusHzNF fl5Vrm10S3SUamxybm+gs6N9me0d87LjmnCHA+A7XfK+OPjxiDXIo5EaRB6ybLReXtJf kOSvtW0qAEeVBQ+aQcbHaQYWW0mgN+q7iIjzEj740qcOjTQQJ9CgYPt1Ymg/HFLQ0kCu 9o7LZVbPLGMM9pJdLt1PMzR/j5iiNQSsrBlgmXCfw5Mjem8JeO8oVlRatm3zz3daVqqd bVxg== X-Received: by 10.180.208.42 with SMTP id mb10mr10831849wic.80.1431843009598; Sat, 16 May 2015 23:10:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (p579BAE95.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [87.155.174.149]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j1sm6010410wia.22.2015.05.16.23.10.08 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 16 May 2015 23:10:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 08:10:58 +0200 From: Franz Fellner <alpine.art.de@gmail.com> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <555830f2b825a_bc411692ecec@TP_L520.notmuch> In-Reply-To: <55582C95.7080706@wht.com.au> References: <55582C95.7080706@wht.com.au> Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] Question for users of the Firefox browser Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Attach: X-Archives-Salt: a4d46576-f979-44ab-a0b1-c7db8e5f2a77 X-Archives-Hash: 21662919a6e2367f765db540ff69e5fc Andrew Lowe wrote: > Hi all, > I've been using Firefox for ages and something struck me recently as a > bit odd. In the Windows version, if I click up into the address or > search boxes, the existing contents are highlighted and if I begin > typing, the existing text is deleted and what I'm typing becomes the > contents. On the Linux version, under KDE, it doesn't. I have to click > into the appropriate edit box, highlight the contents and start typing > or hit either home/end and then start deleting before typing my new URL. > If, for example, the existing text happens to be a google search string, > this can be quite a bit of text to delete. > > So my question, I suppose, is multipart: > > 1) Is this by design? Is this the normal behaviour? > > 2) Have I set a USE flag wrong somewhere that causes this behaviour? > > 3) How do people get around the problem I mentioned above regarding long > URL's, such as a Google search results? > > Any thoughts, greatly appreciated, > > Andrew > You can try to double/triple click the text. Or use <Ctrl+L> or <F6>. I am using vimperator with gui=None, so I don't see the url/search bar. I simply hit "o" or "t" and start typing ;) Concerning the other points: I can't tell you if it's intentional. I never cared ;) You can argue that canging the URL gets mor difficult with the way it works on WIN An I don't think this depends on USE-Flags.