From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-164088-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34946138C9D
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:28:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31567E085A;
	Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:27:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A58F2E0851
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:27:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wief7 with SMTP id f7so17091243wie.0
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 09:27:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=QrY/hKhrXAsjP4LxLenZH3mGKOjjX5Dk745OhTyimec=;
        b=TZlWEi61Rkj/Pd102zJ4/oLeQ3DqcA0CcQOY5JaFQ4Vr8lkVjcAoO8H6SDa6c6iEbb
         rKEM5VPuWVUGFiGTVUtOD2f7SU32VrfBNzCrr0bA1ejtTvHM3v+v4eo0fn3pyT5Mc1gI
         bLdGXCWLEOm8oon+zjAi8MN5hb/c+L7NKkvVFXn97/da0d3Q7heX9BGB+noSmBQ6leRU
         GOK941RstqLeCwvXT4jCY3VJn93HT2UpmOl8k6C7kMoW8o9mrhj4+hP+nG/rRz+INp1j
         DNCofnkahChp+GbeyCgWdcX5dqCPIbn4ukTJ0hGQG37hA8R9quS/hZJQpY/BgWcdwQdQ
         zo2Q==
X-Received: by 10.194.204.230 with SMTP id lb6mr9990730wjc.63.1430411276650;
        Thu, 30 Apr 2015 09:27:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] (p5B0C5F3F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [91.12.95.63])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fs9sm3975220wjc.34.2015.04.30.09.27.55
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Thu, 30 Apr 2015 09:27:55 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5542580A.1010009@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:27:54 +0200
From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation
References: <5540C101.70906@ramses-pyramidenbau.de> <20150429133315.0678687f@digimed.co.uk> <CAPife4kqDapthAqAkpgtf77N3vJhyiCn3UoZWVAP9H+1xBwB=A@mail.gmail.com> <5540DA1F.8030605@ramses-pyramidenbau.de>
In-Reply-To: <5540DA1F.8030605@ramses-pyramidenbau.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 6368da62-a1b0-4c36-9621-7b660ef1a689
X-Archives-Hash: d6cf20e4175d98b935f742e55e4d47b4

Am 29.04.2015 um 15:18 schrieb Ralf:
> Damn, you're absolutely right.
>
> I just tested it using make V=1.
> kernel make does override CFLAGs from the outside.
>
> But that's interesting: my processor supports -march=core-avx2 and none
> of the linux kernel processor family uses this flag...

that does not matter.

Just say no to stupid flags and unnecessary 'optimizations'.