From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFB3D158020 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2022 00:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D141CE0916; Sun, 18 Dec 2022 00:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hosts.co.uk (smtp.hosts.co.uk [85.233.160.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90369E08F3 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2022 00:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host86-138-24-20.range86-138.btcentralplus.com ([86.138.24.20] helo=[192.168.1.65]) by smtp.hosts.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim) (envelope-from ) id 1p6hQ1-000AT3-9g for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2022 00:20:41 +0000 Message-ID: <554153da-3ef9-5192-665f-6eb2dbe1c52c@youngman.org.uk> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 00:20:40 +0000 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.1 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] NAS and replacing with larger drives Content-Language: en-GB To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <9407e524-2226-6ba9-dd7f-bac635d083e3@gmail.com> <10b30d8a-5c5d-a80a-e659-b5624e2848e4@gmail.com> <78c2c83f-fdd8-5c9b-3ac3-7c22bc4b5d64@gmail.com> <0a10c428-94f1-6112-4d88-c97143f9564d@gmail.com> <7a8384d4-4213-b2df-df28-2b56a8b2d030@youngman.org.uk> From: Wol In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d638258c-5a15-4de4-8c48-b2d0e14c05fe X-Archives-Hash: 3e1269ca1b6ec6c4ef7ffd95799da1ad On 17/12/2022 20:03, Mark Knecht wrote: > I'm just asking what's the purpose of doing LVM, or your > suggested layering, specifically on a storage pool for a > home user like Dale? That's the part I don't understand, > especially for a new NAS user like Dale? From my POV, snapshots, in-place short-term backups, it's just flexible. Actually, my main use of lvm is on my system partition - take a snapshot, emerge @world, make sure everything is okay ... What I *thought* I wanted it for was my /home partition - my wife is forever losing stuff, getting muddled and what have you. But I don't think snapshotting would actually protect against what she does :-( But the ability to snapshot anything where you think you might be doing something dangerous is just great - it means you can revert a disaster... And below that, integrity/raid? Well raid protects against a drive failure, integrity protects against disk corruption. They're all unlikely events, but I've got loads of disk space, a powerful system, and I don't stress it, so I've got power to spare for it. Cheers, Wol