From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E43138CA2 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9E0FE091C; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:18:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-f179.google.com (mail-qk0-f179.google.com [209.85.220.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A725AE0883 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qkx62 with SMTP id 62so222207301qkx.0 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 01:18:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3nX9s+tMXwBRaq3pRibD4xkLv9ob6rDpfMYgJyjyVI0=; b=sLc+4D+GuC+msGgPSWnczVwevamMxM8gPN7i2XL8lzBnOXGLBaqoMdJ4ZXjDRxjl2t xkgZNZwR9giLWgvPB1z6kfwnSGZyKg0ZHL0zfsK2+kEZBuiI3WAHWkbDOoMlCuUG2APG p+eX82eRKl/PQKGUfjGx1O078AeZ/Gm5qym7YCquV7/382xYeFb9/Ga+K/Y7udTcjc1o K0b+SXnM4dXHhxaSKsAZpdB/Ey9iIvrv4fZGdzwkB9Ch5rvD084MTZEzJXz0K1RNCzN/ N/WldIBOSFEg+S81GXgUdTeywSF4i+44Nh4j3RIaIe7hWs7VSDUdZEOs1gmlLnQVYURl DiVA== X-Received: by 10.141.28.133 with SMTP id f127mr29036229qhe.14.1429690688871; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 01:18:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-128-251.jan.bellsouth.net. [98.95.128.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c20sm3205889qka.21.2015.04.22.01.18.07 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Apr 2015 01:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5537593E.2040108@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 03:18:06 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] stable java virtuals require unstable java packages References: <5535E331.1040508@gmail.com> <553734A7.2080608@gmail.com> <55373B2E.80704@gmail.com> <55374587.9060701@gmail.com> <55374793.2010900@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 7976e50d-76c1-442d-97fd-967a113a0290 X-Archives-Hash: 8647de5b81d5f65082991012cc9efd53 R0b0t1 wrote: > I've been using 1.7 for some time now, I wouldn't have too many qualms using it. > > Well, I was wondering about other situations not this one. There are quite a few virtuals in the tree. One recent change was the libav/ffmpeg. I'm sure there are others to. Dale :-) :-)