From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: multilib - do I need it?
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 02:03:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <551F2A3D.9010509@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30799.1428079718@ccs.covici.com>
On 03/04/2015 18:48, covici@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2015-04-03, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@waltdnes.org> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 02:12:40PM -0300, Francisco Ares wrote
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> How does one know previously which packages will require 32 bit ABI ?
>>>>
>>>> I have two systems (among others) to consider: one is very simple, built
>>>> using as fewer packages as possible, it is the development system for an
>>>> embedded equipment, and it is 64 bit ABI only - no multilib; the other is
>>>> a general purpose workstation, with lots of packages, and someday, by some
>>>> forgotten reason, I needed to install emul-linux-* .
>>>
>>> Can you attach your /var/lib/portage/world file to a post here? I
>>> assume you have nothing embarressing in it. Almost all applications
>>> that used to require 32-bit emulation now run natively on 64-bit
>>> no-multilib. I recently upgraded a 7+ year old machine from 32-bit
>>> Gentoo to 64-bit-only Gentoo (no-multilib) and I don't have any apps
>>> with problems as 64-bit only.
>>
>> The only two 32-bit apps I've run into on my various XFCE machines are
>> grub-legacy (which requires a 32-bit ncurses lib), and acroread (which
>> requires 100+ 32-bit libraries).
>
> hmmm, I have 7 emul-linux86 packages, but portage did not offer to
> replace them when I checked today for a world update -- I didn't want to
> remove them manually, I thought it might do more harm than good. I am
> not sure whether I need any 32-bit libraries, although I do have
> multilib enabled, but I wonder about those emul-linux-x86 packages. Any
> way for me to tell what is going on here such as dependencies on 32-bit
> libraries?
It's safe to remove emul-linux-x86-* to see what happens next; and
fixing it is trivial. So:
- remove those packages
- fiddle make.conf
- emerge world using -p and inspect the list
If you don;t like what you see, revert your edits and remerge
emul-linux-x86-*. They are binary packages so the emerge is rather
quick. As long as you didn't re-merge anything else in the interim,
nothing will break
--
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-04 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-02 17:12 [gentoo-user] multilib - do I need it? Francisco Ares
2015-04-02 17:43 ` Mick
2015-04-03 1:30 ` Walter Dnes
2015-04-03 0:44 ` Peter Humphrey
2015-04-03 5:30 ` Walter Dnes
2015-04-03 11:01 ` Peter Humphrey
2015-04-03 15:47 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2015-04-03 16:48 ` covici
2015-04-03 17:45 ` Mick
2015-04-03 18:09 ` covici
2015-04-03 18:36 ` Mick
2015-04-03 22:34 ` Peter Humphrey
2015-04-03 23:42 ` covici
2015-04-04 0:03 ` Alan McKinnon [this message]
2015-04-04 4:47 ` covici
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=551F2A3D.9010509@gmail.com \
--to=alan.mckinnon@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox