From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4867A138CCA for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:59:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C9CFE0968; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f170.google.com (mail-qc0-f170.google.com [209.85.216.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3262EE08AC for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcfy6 with SMTP id y6so47311271qcf.2 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 03:59:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vxtexzJMxaVzZ2MSYbJaqq2Ud21opo44xWMlHvQkj7M=; b=g9wxDAyYeWRCKU/sDTLDnAf+WSgMKpCtTWd8TEVGzQv92aAulqp2Cwcbs9DsdWzMyr GozZTpGMC1vy/7qzX3waQSQ7mwfOZ45dqeh/NZZmnOpdeTZ8SCynHVs+oZgR5hAfZ07m pnRq1dVZvVEShL24pWCj64KxMuvzBmFHiSWi11iYuXwYzwqDTOzZLEd5QW2T2A1Z/i/E Z5O+1OCQnIptl4elp6KQGZqiiITe/9UZ1lCRZo5TPqXbl2i8z2a7YRVl/kbFzZuO0/Ls 8GgNm24qSDxLuPeVspvrBsHsupvRPjclwURHQBZDfbWQZeAnk9/IGT6cfea+1wJq/VYJ or0Q== X-Received: by 10.140.145.210 with SMTP id 201mr3576706qhr.104.1427713166679; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 03:59:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-117-248.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.117.248]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 10sm7426484qha.38.2015.03.30.03.59.25 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Mar 2015 03:59:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55192C8C.4050009@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 05:59:24 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] This nite's switch to "full multilib" References: <5517CCCC.90800@seismic.de> <201503291722.00507.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <55183166.6000205@gmail.com> <201503291830.25834.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <55183C0E.2010600@xunil.at> <55184177.7030601@gmail.com> <5518785B.3040704@xunil.at> <551881EA.7040705@gmail.com> <5519139B.7020400@gmail.com> <20150330113453.1c82b4f9@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20150330113453.1c82b4f9@digimed.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b1c06784-ef56-4538-b221-69f55f978743 X-Archives-Hash: caaf177b1bcd20302b5a6145d51f1a94 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 04:12:59 -0500, Dale wrote: > >> Dang. I had to add about 90 packages to my package.use and some more to >> the keyword file. >> >> I wonder if make.conf would be better in my case too? My use file just >> grew my a huge amount. > You package.use has grown by one filesystem block at most, how much extra > disk space and CPU cycles would you use by compiling 32 bit options for > every package that has them? I wasn't worried about disk space, just that I rarely use entries in that file. Heck, it's enough to manage the other package.* files already. > > If you use a single file for package.use, it does make it far more > cumbersome to manage, but that's why I switched to separate files many > years ago. > > I've tried separate files and having them all in one file. Either way, each entry requires a person to manage it. For me at least, it's six of one and half a dozen of the other. ;-) Dale :-) :-)