From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466C9138CBD for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 22:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B694E0A5E; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 22:15:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oc.oops.co.at (oc.oops.co.at [176.58.98.19]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B24E0A0B for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 22:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oc.oops.co.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A8088255 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 22:14:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at oc.oops.co.at Received: from oc.oops.co.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (oc.oops.co.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id n0KBt5hV5pAd for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 22:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:15c0:65ff:8742:ca5:441f:4b33:496f] (unknown [IPv6:2001:15c0:65ff:8742:ca5:441f:4b33:496f]) by oc.oops.co.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 530F788254 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 22:14:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xunil.at; s=mailout; t=1426112089; bh=2iszTr8cw20tapp/waIGDow6PTKbb/avVRm9somh4NY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=pgmvyiPUnXY5LJSc5cLDwuDuvZS7ar0V7LU+8DpwfkVj9H4wD9lFA7Onbu4As5sfq 1eNf+WRg/boye8+r6y/T4Axb47fI1hSpHA7e0X751u9dHNxDDhahltn7pJalzbBiSW 9WNgXdY1vOtOU8oqj/luCT3gjsX6IwI+OdevvVZ8= Message-ID: <5500BE59.8070609@xunil.at> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 23:14:49 +0100 From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" Organization: oops! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] best practise for 4 disks ... redundancy References: <54FFE4A2.3060008@xunil.at> <20150311110929.5fdb4970@digimed.co.uk> <550064BB.1000706@xunil.at> <20150311160631.53647abf@hactar.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20150311160631.53647abf@hactar.digimed.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a207dae4-2dda-4fe4-bf18-7f991020ce21 X-Archives-Hash: bc8d6d37d10cc1e2856dddc77bb97010 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Am 11.03.2015 um 17:06 schrieb Neil Bothwick: >> So RAID1 with vfat as ESP ? > > That's how I'd do it. I have /boot on RAID1 on this box (but not as > FAT and it's a BIOS motherboard) with everything else on a btrfs > RAID and it works well. I will redo my setup tomorrow ... thanks So your suggestion is with MBR and not GPT? I still wonder if to do UEFI and GPT because both are the more modern ways of doing things (and be prepared for future developments) or just stay with BIOS and MBR as long as I don't need it (with disks smaller than 2 TB etc) S -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVAL5ZAAoJEClcuD1V0PzmLKoP/1dZwbyBmu4qbnQF8+IXKOHd QGeoGpoyP0ZYQaAoVNvklYNqeSYYsKHY0vV7olcAj28NLT6UsFd3J3NDbgxw9OlP KecuwIGdOylsPF+NDJ2hM5LlREVvhNzsHnMgkmzjaq6F+30rBTNIKSYJNxsxX26q wEjQIEPxFHxuafaW8tFROZqHtwr56XPf9PEB2DDrt2jK5H+roUx0u4BU6gLnQO3W Zf6tdbfW0rlRhllPGJUKaJOQp1sOnez7C2WToyVJX2Jy44pbuZ1SpUbRl008JY+6 M4QMSqbCvb41ud8TYgkZetFKHB9r/xLN0uE1oq1rlFh0mbw7TU+K+Lt4ICA/u/cN JVFM7tKuO+6wgzl+zJOWfbuGwXDAjYElDzquHCGIu823oezb6LXfA5GMJMqC2//e CnP4irR+D3fZIj5i5E6+7+R1wy2KVgm7FDinYmhHHzr1X/8Nj+ff1jGZx2j1gTk3 Mzc68GKYzewIJn5iR7/jt02FIvo0mVrkGCBMgnDnI90hFwUzBOCBdbkYp+j4kKRe d10/8mdlVwnCS0uXqXLCMbnaMYzZDn3YOrEdoNEkXkXxnUKOmfMqwTrT2TRvCyVW iz5r829IrXi80rtBn2+x9zTMZXodWUEj+Nzd2k2ok7hAqkIImcGXOAjh/Qj6wHbq xVNLmuNC7mnQTLWyrva5 =VI4K -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----