From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88498138A1A for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:48:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ECB11E09F9; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f51.google.com (mail-la0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7090AE09B1 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:48:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by labpv20 with SMTP id pv20so31276269lab.8 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:48:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aq+Wr+JFtpQKCrBP21nWvGTNHfzORQ6BYt/Ley2GOoM=; b=1IBe3jfu2NDeluAOJQQuDom4wKAIOphu60cWk+ous1WKEmxxr8lNYYf8hLUl89nzfc LlJisUSRmwXPlXQITKY7OrU7OZnb0iVEtU4dLGZkm6R0iq6lWb1O+DdylNBUFl+xu9x8 PZAZWv7BLR6yf+lb+xo+0j23kXv/BpsH/aFcf/HR/ImfiNWAwSQan9JNCWlUVBFczQon 3mAxLgcx0ZMoCQa5XK31TEolvJhvMKmaQHOwwm+aoX0gDziyyuy+J8o4oVDtlZqzpX6k o8F6Z+NzoUiq0DUhJYHLNkyAelOciOvC2IzBBvejZrCxMahA7wAyum4Y7UwcyZkol/MG vFKg== X-Received: by 10.112.37.197 with SMTP id a5mr24826372lbk.19.1424112517898; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:48:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from cosmo ([193.200.85.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xl2sm734211lbb.6.2015.02.16.10.48.37 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:48:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54e23b85.a2a0700a.47e7.39bc@mx.google.com> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 20:47:03 +0200 From: Gevisz To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Package conflict while trying to emerge chromium In-Reply-To: <20150213230516.425316c1@digimed.co.uk> References: <54dca7d6.6154700a.56c5.3b22@mx.google.com> <20150212132455.774e7a66@digimed.co.uk> <54de3686.442d980a.3abc.71f2@mx.google.com> <20150213230516.425316c1@digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c65d7a48-eb83-4ca8-b94e-bc0f7e00937f X-Archives-Hash: f5506350959b05ea79f422c64db809ca On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 23:05:16 +0000 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:36:45 +0200, Gevisz wrote: > > > > Has that line actually been inserted into package.use? > > > Portage doesn't add it to the live file, you need to run > > > cfg-update or similar to handle it. > > > > As I have said, it was inserted in the ._cfg0002_package.use file > > as the recommendation to insert it to the package.use. > > Inserting it into ._cfg0002_package.use does nothing but cause portage to > prompt you to run etc-update. Until you do that nothing has changed as > portage will still tell you to add the USE change. Thank you for your reply but my point was that two *default* USE flag setting produce the package block.