From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF549138ACE for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 06:27:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72F56E094F; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 06:27:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (mail-wg0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 503D9E08F8 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 06:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wggy19 with SMTP id y19so17528486wgg.13 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:27:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0LiMGbw+6h3P/ZYyw2rnqFJs7W1VjeeSFBHMvsAPrfY=; b=oydFFdRCfkB24cLaNfXCVjVwL4dJFV2rhx3EM813vEI8VMW20NnTt71/QGifzsoyaW BDzh9MwuGWJVa6SbJqO9kp9shVA+NaEwyCgCjcS7ePtE3yKVJWK1VudVccSCDzQRCBTu QWmrZhGy+SyE5AqERQIssNqxQ0uiKKIVz5AoOhu6QyNeFZ3ubE8fA2NpzeXTeLEoATUz BuROENnbxOWJWrVdH1qhNyM9dKfOdAXzYvz45833oVQuAsnSRLenqZbfBLwZDutvNtU2 v0qVN/OKxBQduTFKTkqtrNpv8uUnZEkqB/cbv2bcuD7+X+WXMGCxYYT1MkSXfVLVsgYz 5HHw== X-Received: by 10.194.120.40 with SMTP id kz8mr24624383wjb.21.1425018427110; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:27:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.178.21] (p4FE5ECF0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.229.236.240]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dn7sm1342424wid.12.2015.02.26.22.27.05 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:27:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54F00E39.60102@googlemail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 07:27:05 +0100 From: Volker Armin Hemmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: heat codes References: <54EFA5F6.2040905@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: f540ed20-609d-437e-a73f-f1c2b8d680d5 X-Archives-Hash: 2747c7296d6eead00ddadff24577643f Am 27.02.2015 um 02:23 schrieb James: > Volker Armin Hemmann googlemail.com> writes: > > >> em, but you are already monitoring it! > Maybe. It hard to tell if there are more than one > temperature sensor, what buss interfacet they are on > and if it is a calculated or esitmated or actual temperature > sensor. it pretty much tells you all that with its name. And for radeon - there is only one. > > >>>> Does anyone with similar hardware have a more extensive list? >> no, that is all you got. > That's pretty sad. All that hardware and 3 temps.... > > >>>> What I'd really like is a very fast (real time?) gui to watch >> you won't get that, because the senors don't update in 'realtime'. > Sure. But if I knew of a relatively consistent delay semantic, use the command below and watch for changes. Some boards update every second, some every three seconds. > I could align the delays in temperature sensing with what's going > on with code compiling or execution; even if it is a rough estimate. > > >> watch -n1 sensors. > > not bad. for quick checks. > >> Works even without systemd. Shocking, I know. > As usual, your insight and singular wit makes for pleasurable reading. > > thx, > James > > > >