From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-162384-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1C2D138AD6
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:57:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DFB9E08A8;
	Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:57:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F0F9E086D
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:57:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wghb13 with SMTP id b13so15592511wgh.0
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:57:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=yi6PxODSzXJARnc4v5ZuawFGW3G8VVikzkBHjUOxrQQ=;
        b=oiUInbNIPTqLkxaOQfaeAo8yuIxgD4IY/jw3DHNfJTVcsD/7P7XMiXMfytqHeusThC
         hiynubpyDy+rWHOcHMcGqKTX0UHr44W1SXqIaLqfzjAhh8WnOfhU9z80H6MZ2VSFZq1b
         zHfYoIqY/eNDWTFhUO2aehiCUvLjqvg1sp206Vtgn1Jkx1CNQpSqCJmJPQEDseGce51z
         8sfu5N91//kG3t19H24UigUg+qhoF3HqE9AhoORACAMX/o/HsQhM8Dmyuhh9elf2c/5h
         DM1fLeSR3onJuARrJBrTp5U3Ttn6F6uVgl1d/skAjgZ4Da5YB4z2U58827iisUwWkSGR
         DPJg==
X-Received: by 10.180.79.65 with SMTP id h1mr503797wix.59.1424991470755;
        Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:57:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] (p4FC11E61.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.193.30.97])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fo8sm248099wib.14.2015.02.26.14.57.49
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:57:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54EFA4EC.3080603@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 23:57:48 +0100
From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] zfs io scheduler
References: <87r3tgjnpr.fsf@heimdali.yagibdah.de>
In-Reply-To: <87r3tgjnpr.fsf@heimdali.yagibdah.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 40975e46-b61a-489b-a13c-209c0289ce52
X-Archives-Hash: 37eedace7db5cdc1fad4be3ebfed52b9

Am 23.02.2015 um 22:57 schrieb lee:
> Hi,
>
> is zfs setting the io scheduler to noop for the disks in the pool?

no?

I have it set in an init script.

>
>
> I'm currently finding that the IO performance is horrible with a pool
> made from two mirrored disks ...
>
>
>
then set it to noop.