From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C427C138A1A for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 06:51:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A5D1E0881; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 06:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 165DFE083E for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 06:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id fb4so14959209wid.2 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 22:50:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=R3jve0Doa9VnIs7ZlSiPIVGEu+4raWfwePUhsd/qX6Q=; b=e6UALD6XAlFp4H0A7U3vcRY2AX9fa5Gi54d5R+BYy/Os92l+5hjulA3f7Uek3rZTYk cBawsA2mG/PRrAjv0/tH2aX7fxQtSGwS1BMkw8/7Cv3PWId/cXW8OQEkM80EgGLE2Cy1 pBzuH4iPMmeUHxUa2S/fkF96Vu++Vmf5k/SkOVfvva2boZZVdPMev8jYcxw0vGNGHiEW npp17XcI431hJd+eI5UGSwENUegZoyOwc5pS7f679ilAJyfGuhEB9Wy0rEKMKbpoZHGM Vnx6dMP76OSyS+gpxu0TkOQcfKAd2e/FzoDi1YkdgluZ8JwHY79PqZLWuLpzQG26/H44 t4YQ== X-Received: by 10.194.60.235 with SMTP id k11mr39107147wjr.131.1423464654716; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 22:50:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.42] ([41.85.145.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id do1sm7775346wib.3.2015.02.08.22.50.53 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 08 Feb 2015 22:50:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54D8588A.6040502@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 08:49:46 +0200 From: Alan McKinnon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Making a new frame-buffer console font References: <3944562.GxCy2uQorQ@wstn> <54D764DB.408@gmail.com> <20150208173133.08b943b7@hal9000.localdomain> <18021002.tIsJpVLqAy@wstn> In-Reply-To: <18021002.tIsJpVLqAy@wstn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 232887f3-da45-4fc8-8c82-926a5602f540 X-Archives-Hash: 8c0c8de359a18416d98d482f13474113 On 09/02/2015 00:50, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Sunday 08 February 2015 17:31:33 wabenbau@gmail.com wrote: >> Am Sonntag, 08.02.2015 um 15:30 schrieb Alan McKinnon >> : >>> I actively seek out and use fonts with a stroked zero (or at least >>> with a dot in the middle of the zero. I can never remember if the >>> digit is the fat one or the thin one >> >> It's the same with me. :-) > > I'd have thought it was easy enough: the zero is the same width as the > other numerals. The O is bigger. > I have a horrible suspicion all 3 of us wear spectacles :-) And it's been a few years since I could spot a difference of 2 pixels wide! -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com