[gentoo-user] new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

[gentoo-user] new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

[Harry Putnam]

After installing piles of X related pkgs including all the lxde pkgs:
  [I] lxde-base/lxde-common
  [I] lxde-base/lxde-icon-theme
  [I] lxde-base/lxde-meta

When pressing the all important `run' item in the lxde main menu (at
left of bottom panel), it does nothing more than flash the bottom panel.

It does not offer any dialog at all.

Although I've used lxde for 2 yrs or so.. and installed it a number of
times on gentoo and other distros, I've never had this problem before.

I'm guessing something is missing in the install... but have no idea
what it might be.

Any ideas?

[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

[James]

Harry Putnam <reader <at> newsguy.com> writes:


> After installing piles of X related pkgs including all the lxde pkgs:

> Any ideas?

lxde is deprecated, imho. [1]

lxqt is the future of that lineage [2]


[1] http://sourceforge.net/p/lxde/mailman/message/32927295/

[2] http://lxqt.org/


You may want to read the entire bug there on the remaining
issues with lxqt-8. From what I gather there are problems
upgradeing an existing lxde setup; but installing lxqt 8.0 or
1.0 as a fresh install is working for most. ymmv.

hth,
James

[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

[James]

James <wireless <at> tampabay.rr.com> writes:




> You may want to read the entire bug there on the remaining
> issues with lxqt-8. From what I gather there are problems
> upgradeing an existing lxde setup; but installing lxqt 8.0 or
> 1.0 as a fresh install is working for most. ymmv.

Oops, 
Forgot the BGO ref:
Bug 525410

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525410


hth,
James

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

[Michael Vetter]

> lxde is deprecated, imho. [1]
> 
> lxqt is the future of that lineage [2]
> [1] http://sourceforge.net/p/lxde/mailman/message/32927295/
> [2] http://lxqt.org/

LXDE is still in development, LXQt is just a new project by some people
who also developed LXDE. [3]

> When pressing the all important `run' item in the lxde main menu (at
left of bottom panel), it does nothing more than flash the bottom panel.

I am not a LXDE user so I am not quite sure what the "run" item is. In
case it's the main menu you might try right clicking on the menu and go
set a .menu file. At least that is what I had to do in LXQt.

Good luck.
Michael

[3] http://blog.lxde.org/?p=1310

[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

[James]

Michael Vetter <michael.vetter <at> uni-konstanz.de> writes:


> > lxde is deprecated, imho. [1]
> LXDE is still in development, LXQt is just a new project by some people
> who also developed LXDE. [3]

Yes, the tenor has changed over the months to keep the base of users in tact.   

But, if you read the 'tea leaves' this desktop lineage is on the move,
and devs are few and very limited to support several trunks.


> I am not a LXDE user so I am not quite sure what the "run" item is. In
> case it's the main menu you might try right clicking on the menu and go
> set a .menu file. At least that is what I had to do in LXQt.

What your not continuing with LXDE?  Dude, lxde is dead; there just is no
scheduled funeral announce until lxqt is more feature rich, *imho*.  ymmv.


> Good luck.
> Michael
> [3] http://blog.lxde.org/?p=1310

I read this. I see no commitment to lxde long term. He is newly installing,
so lxde is probably a bad choice, if he intends to use it for a few years.
ymmv. Futhermore is Weyland in his sights?  Dunno, but that seems to
be the target, with qt5 resource utilization. I bet many codes that are
centric to qt4 will not keep up, and thus be dropped, eventually.


hth,
James

[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

[Harry Putnam]

James <wireless@tampabay.rr.com> writes:

> lxde is deprecated, imho. [1]
>
> lxqt is the future of that lineage [2]

Sounds like propaganda rather rather than any sort of answer to the question.

[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

[James]

Harry Putnam <reader <at> newsguy.com> writes:


> James <wireless <at> tampabay.rr.com> writes:
> > lxde is deprecated, imho. [1]
> > lxqt is the future of that lineage [2]
> Sounds like propaganda rather rather than any sort of answer to 
> the question.


OK, if that is true, who is answering your questions on lxde, which
I am still using? I have lots of breakage on lxde; I do not bother
fixing. I'm working on migrating to lxqt.  Good luck with lxde.


James

[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

[Harry Putnam]

James <wireless@tampabay.rr.com> writes:

> Harry Putnam <reader <at> newsguy.com> writes:
>
>
>> James <wireless <at> tampabay.rr.com> writes:
>> > lxde is deprecated, imho. [1]
>> > lxqt is the future of that lineage [2]
>> Sounds like propaganda rather rather than any sort of answer to 
>> the question.

>
> OK, if that is true, who is answering your questions on lxde, which
> I am still using? I have lots of breakage on lxde; I do not bother
> fixing. I'm working on migrating to lxqt.  Good luck with lxde.

Not sure I follow your reasoning there...

I'm posting here because I have lxde working well enough for my
purposes on 6 other hosts... none of them are gentoo.

Its only on gentoo that I ran into this problem with the `run' menu
item, so I know for certain it is not a general breakage as you seem
to imply.

You mentioned that you are using lxde... I'm assuming, on gentoo.
So do you see the same problem with the `run' item on main menu?

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

[Tom H]

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com> wrote:
> James <wireless@tampabay.rr.com> writes:
>>
>> OK, if that is true, who is answering your questions on lxde, which
>> I am still using? I have lots of breakage on lxde; I do not bother
>> fixing. I'm working on migrating to lxqt. Good luck with lxde.
>
> Not sure I follow your reasoning there...
>
> I'm posting here because I have lxde working well enough for my
> purposes on 6 other hosts... none of them are gentoo.

LXDE and Razor-QT were merged to create LXQT.

LXDE'll carry on for as long as there are developers willing to keep
it going; and as long as GTK+ 2 is still alive.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

[Raffaele BELARDI]

Harry Putnam wrote:
> Its only on gentoo that I ran into this problem with the `run' menu
> item, so I know for certain it is not a general breakage as you seem
> to imply.
> 
> You mentioned that you are using lxde... I'm assuming, on gentoo.
> So do you see the same problem with the `run' item on main menu?
> 

Same here, I did not notice before because I never use it. To be more
precise, when I select 'Run' the panel disappears for ~1s then reappears
but no 'Run' window.

$ equery l lxde*
 * Searching for lxde* ...
[IP-] [  ] lxde-base/lxde-common-0.5.5-r3:0
[IP-] [  ] lxde-base/lxde-icon-theme-0.5.0-r1:0
[IP-] [  ] lxde-base/lxde-meta-0.5.5-r4:0

[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

[Harry Putnam]

Raffaele BELARDI <raffaele.belardi@st.com> writes:

> Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Its only on gentoo that I ran into this problem with the `run' menu
>> item, so I know for certain it is not a general breakage as you seem
>> to imply.
>> 
>> You mentioned that you are using lxde... I'm assuming, on gentoo.
>> So do you see the same problem with the `run' item on main menu?
>> 
>
> Same here, I did not notice before because I never use it. To be more
> precise, when I select 'Run' the panel disappears for ~1s then reappears
> but no 'Run' window.
>
> $ equery l lxde*
>  * Searching for lxde* ...
> [IP-] [  ] lxde-base/lxde-common-0.5.5-r3:0
> [IP-] [  ] lxde-base/lxde-icon-theme-0.5.0-r1:0
> [IP-] [  ] lxde-base/lxde-meta-0.5.5-r4:0

Thanks for the helpful input... please see my message furhter in
thread with an attached post from an lxde developer that explains
a bit about what we are seeing.

[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

[Harry Putnam]

James <wireless@tampabay.rr.com> writes:

> Harry Putnam <reader <at> newsguy.com> writes:
>
>
>> James <wireless <at> tampabay.rr.com> writes:
>> > lxde is deprecated, imho. [1]
>> > lxqt is the future of that lineage [2]
>> Sounds like propaganda rather rather than any sort of answer to 
>> the question.
>
>
> OK, if that is true, who is answering your questions on lxde, which
> I am still using? I have lots of breakage on lxde; I do not bother
> fixing. I'm working on migrating to lxqt.  Good luck with lxde.

For your information:  Attached is message from the lxde devel gmane
group from Jonathan Thibault <jonathan@navigue.com>.

PS: I installed and tried out lxqt.  I was not impressed.  It appears
only about half ready for production.

[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

[Harry Putnam]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 215 bytes --]

Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com> writes:

> For your information:  Attached is message from the lxde devel gmane
> group from Jonathan Thibault <jonathan@navigue.com>.

Whoops forgot to attach Jonathan's message:


[-- Attachment #2: message from lxde devel --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 9667 bytes --]

From nobody Wed Dec 17 12:33:39 2014
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jonathan Thibault <jonathan@navigue.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.desktop.lxde.devel
Subject: Re: main menu `run' item produces no dialog
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 16:36:05 -0500
Lines: 191
Approved: news@gmane.org
Message-ID: <5490A5C5.9090907@navigue.com>
References: <877fxrv0pz.fsf@reader.local.lan>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------070107080209010203000207"
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418765821 14997 80.91.229.3 (16 Dec 2014 21:37:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:37:01 +0000 (UTC)
To: Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com>, lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Original-X-From: lxde-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Tue Dec 16 22:36:56 2014
Return-path: <lxde-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>
Envelope-to: gcdld-lxde-list@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.sourceforge.net ([216.34.181.88])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lxde-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>)
	id 1Y0znZ-0005ok-Sq
	for gcdld-lxde-list@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 22:36:54 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lxde-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>)
	id 1Y0zmx-0008Nt-7y; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:36:15 +0000
Original-Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <jonathan@navigue.com>) id 1Y0zmv-0008Nk-DU
	for lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:36:13 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of navigue.com
	designates 74.117.40.3 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=74.117.40.3; envelope-from=jonathan@navigue.com;
	helo=mail.navigue.com; 
Original-Received: from mail.navigue.com ([74.117.40.3])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Y0zmt-0007KI-Lq
	for lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:36:13 +0000
Original-Received: from [192.168.7.190] (unknown [74.117.40.10])
	by mail.navigue.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C425B1A01A9;
	Tue, 16 Dec 2014 16:36:05 -0500 (EST)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
In-Reply-To: <877fxrv0pz.fsf@reader.local.lan>
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1Y0zmt-0007KI-Lq
X-BeenThere: lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <lxde-list.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list>,
	<mailto:lxde-list-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=lxde-list>
List-Post: <mailto:lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:lxde-list-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list>,
	<mailto:lxde-list-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: lxde-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.desktop.lxde.devel:5536
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.desktop.lxde.devel/5536>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------070107080209010203000207
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The version of lxpanel included in gentoo actually segfaults when using
'run'.  You should see it crash and respawn.

This is fixed under the new version of lxpanel but gentoo isn't pushing
it yet.  There's extensive fixes in lxterminal 0.2.0 which is also not
included in gentoo.

I've included a couple ebuilds for convenience though they might not
work right now since sourceforge in emergency maintenance mode.

Jonathan

On 16/12/14 02:44 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Setup:
>   Very new install gentoo linux
>     lxde version 0.5.5
>
> This is  very new install of gentoo, however I have installed lxde on
> quite a few different hosts over time, and never hit this particular
> problem.  I have no idea how to debug it.
>
> After the install was complete I startrf X and lxde with
> startx.
>
> Once up, it shows the nice lxde desktop.  However, one of the things I use
> often is the `run' item in the main lxde menu. (The one on the left
> with the nice aero-dynamic looking Icon)
>
> So, clicking the `run' item normally produces a small dialog where one
> can run command line type commands.
>
> In the current case, all that happens is the bottom panel (taskbar)
> flashes but nothing else happens.  No dialog appears.
>
> Any clues?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
> from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
> with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
> Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Lxde-list mailing list
> Lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list


--------------070107080209010203000207
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 name="lxpanel-0.8.0.ebuild"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="lxpanel-0.8.0.ebuild"

# Copyright 1999-2014 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/lxde-base/lxpanel/lxpanel-0.7.0-r1.ebuild,v 1.1 2014/09/10 01:54:45 nullishzero Exp $

EAPI="4"

inherit autotools eutils readme.gentoo versionator

MAJOR_VER="$(get_version_component_range 1-2)"

DESCRIPTION="Lightweight X11 desktop panel for LXDE"
HOMEPAGE="http://lxde.org/"
SRC_URI="mirror://sourceforge/lxde/LXPanel%20%28desktop%20panel%29/LXPanel%20${MAJOR_VER}.x/${P}.tar.xz"

LICENSE="GPL-2"
KEYWORDS="~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~ppc ~x86 ~x86-interix ~amd64-linux ~arm-linux ~x86-linux"
SLOT="0"
IUSE="+alsa wifi"
RESTRICT="test"  # bug 249598

RDEPEND="x11-libs/gtk+:2
	>=x11-libs/libfm-1.2.0
	x11-libs/libwnck:1
	x11-libs/libXmu
	x11-libs/libXpm
	x11-libs/cairo
	x11-libs/gdk-pixbuf
	x11-libs/libX11
	dev-libs/keybinder
	lxde-base/lxmenu-data
	lxde-base/menu-cache
	alsa? ( media-libs/alsa-lib )
	wifi? ( net-wireless/wireless-tools )"
DEPEND="${RDEPEND}
	virtual/pkgconfig
	sys-devel/gettext"

DOC_CONTENTS="If you have problems with broken icons shown in the main panel,
you will have to configure panel settings via its menu.
This will not be an issue with first time installations."

src_prepare() {
	#bug #522404
	#epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-0.7.0-right-click-fix.patch
	#epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-0.5.9-sandbox.patch
	#bug #415595
	sed -i "s:-Werror::" configure.ac || die
	eautoreconf
}

src_configure() {
	local plugins="netstatus,volume,cpu,deskno,batt, \
		kbled,xkb,thermal,cpufreq,monitors"

	use wifi && plugins+=",netstat"
	use alsa && plugins+=",volumealsa"
	[[ ${CHOST} == *-interix* ]] && plugins=deskno,kbled,xkb

	econf $(use_enable alsa) --with-x --with-plugins="${plugins}"
	# the gtk+ dep already pulls in libX11, so we might as well hardcode with-x
}

src_install () {
	emake DESTDIR="${D}" install
	dodoc AUTHORS ChangeLog README

	# Get rid of the .la files.
	find "${D}" -name '*.la' -delete

	readme.gentoo_create_doc
}

pkg_postinst() {
	readme.gentoo_print_elog
}

--------------070107080209010203000207
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 name="lxterminal-0.2.0.ebuild"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="lxterminal-0.2.0.ebuild"

# Copyright 1999-2013 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/lxde-base/lxterminal/lxterminal-0.1.11.ebuild,v 1.7 2013/02/22 20:59:46 zmedico Exp $

EAPI="4"

DESCRIPTION="Lightweight vte-based tabbed terminal emulator for LXDE"
HOMEPAGE="http://lxde.sf.net/"
SRC_URI="mirror://sourceforge/lxde/${P}.tar.xz"

LICENSE="GPL-2"
KEYWORDS="~alpha amd64 arm ~mips ppc x86 ~x86-interix ~amd64-linux ~arm-linux ~x86-linux"
SLOT="0"
IUSE=""

RDEPEND="x11-libs/gtk+:2
	dev-libs/glib:2
	x11-libs/vte:0"
DEPEND="${RDEPEND}
	virtual/pkgconfig
	sys-devel/gettext
	>=dev-util/intltool-0.40.0"

src_install () {
	emake DESTDIR="${D}" install
	dodoc AUTHORS README
}

--------------070107080209010203000207
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
--------------070107080209010203000207
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

[Dale]

Harry Putnam wrote:
> James <wireless@tampabay.rr.com> writes:
>
>> Harry Putnam <reader <at> newsguy.com> writes:
>>
>>
>>> James <wireless <at> tampabay.rr.com> writes:
>>>> lxde is deprecated, imho. [1]
>>>> lxqt is the future of that lineage [2]
>>> Sounds like propaganda rather rather than any sort of answer to 
>>> the question.
>>
>> OK, if that is true, who is answering your questions on lxde, which
>> I am still using? I have lots of breakage on lxde; I do not bother
>> fixing. I'm working on migrating to lxqt.  Good luck with lxde.
> For your information:  Attached is message from the lxde devel gmane
> group from Jonathan Thibault <jonathan@navigue.com>.
>
> PS: I installed and tried out lxqt.  I was not impressed.  It appears
> only about half ready for production.
>
>
>
>


What was supposed to be attached again?  ;-) 

Dale

:-) :-) 

[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

[Harry Putnam]

Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> writes:

> What was supposed to be attached again?  ;-) 
>
> Dale

hehe... after noticing my `senior moment, I did repost to include the
attachement ... I don't see it on the group, perhaps no attachments
are allowed...

Here is it is inline:

-------       -------       ---=---       -------       ------- 
NOTE: [-ed HP The ebuild referred to can be gotten on the gmane group
that appears in Jonathan's headers below, if anyone is interested ]
-------       -------       ---=---       -------       ------- 

From: Jonathan Thibault <jonathan@navigue.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.desktop.lxde.devel
Subject: Re: main menu `run' item produces no dialog
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 16:36:05 -0500

[...] snipped piles of headers

The version of lxpanel included in gentoo actually segfaults when using
'run'.  You should see it crash and respawn.

This is fixed under the new version of lxpanel but gentoo isn't pushing
it yet.  There's extensive fixes in lxterminal 0.2.0 which is also not
included in gentoo.

I've included a couple ebuilds for convenience though they might not
work right now since sourceforge in emergency maintenance mode.


Jonathan

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

[Dale]

Harry Putnam wrote:
> Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> What was supposed to be attached again?  ;-) 
>>
>> Dale
> hehe... after noticing my `senior moment, I did repost to include the
> attachement ... I don't see it on the group, perhaps no attachments
> are allowed...
>
> Here is it is inline:
>
> -------       -------       ---=---       -------       ------- 
> NOTE: [-ed HP The ebuild referred to can be gotten on the gmane group
> that appears in Jonathan's headers below, if anyone is interested ]
> -------       -------       ---=---       -------       ------- 
>
> From: Jonathan Thibault <jonathan@navigue.com>
> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.desktop.lxde.devel
> Subject: Re: main menu `run' item produces no dialog
> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 16:36:05 -0500
>
> [...] snipped piles of headers
>
> The version of lxpanel included in gentoo actually segfaults when using
> 'run'.  You should see it crash and respawn.
>
> This is fixed under the new version of lxpanel but gentoo isn't pushing
> it yet.  There's extensive fixes in lxterminal 0.2.0 which is also not
> included in gentoo.
>
> I've included a couple ebuilds for convenience though they might not
> work right now since sourceforge in emergency maintenance mode.
>
>
> Jonathan
>

It made it to the list and folks attach stuff a lot so it is allowed. 
Anyway, we were likely typing at about the same time.  I just wanted to
make sure you knew it wasn't attached. 

Senior moment?  I'm 47 here and do this sort of thing quite often.  I
hope I'm not *to* senior.  lol

Dale

:-)  :-)