From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FAA1389E2 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0AADE0977; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:48:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com (mail-la0-f41.google.com [209.85.215.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93AE7E07AE for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:48:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id gf13so1128649lab.28 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:48:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wmhFExIndiPQqBTsiobhN6q8uTWRSqsxGPaotI6tq3k=; b=taalJ44MdYDezcXOeU5K+ujL54zr0wKHTvaKLHlB9r85+srpyatWhXW/+bkP2/pMjf RtiXKMe27kzTJPDgFefv/6Wiv+5MLhDl82qWgYTyafen0kHMoiZZn6O3BeMbvogrKQeU UmJrtHk6FBHDSxlwclfKQ7kjhCegw1QwYFogkP/mlqHJmE6twSJ9WG8v5xVBqwqKhcuq O4vXc2mLX8jCVflkrtdF1PLEym/+Vrwn81U2+o1ARZhdFKLhnzIvWLeDxABwQ9Ai1INe kbd6phlaU74ftqFz58trHLxChjR/niGo/t4ioU5fqxLXRKJR0dexW3BMaR3oaxp8piAe JgEQ== X-Received: by 10.112.171.6 with SMTP id aq6mr29622057lbc.28.1416941305926; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:48:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from cosmo ([193.200.85.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q6sm550400lag.35.2014.11.25.10.48.25 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:48:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5474cef9.261b980a.5e7c.2078@mx.google.com> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 20:46:25 +0200 From: Gevisz To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] The future of linux, and Gentoo specifically now In-Reply-To: References: <546EE70C.2050506@yourstruly.sx> <20141121173600.GA1029@ca.inter.net> <547370D2.50009@marc-stuermer.de> <54737886.a3a7700a.6f81.4209@mx.google.com> <20141124210516.53a54a90@digimed.co.uk> <54740bae.c12a980a.75de.01e4@mx.google.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ed5fca60-7eb0-4f30-b8f5-c1256931955a X-Archives-Hash: 812e968c41c3b843d37f8cd88de25606 On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:21:06 -0700 Maxim Wexler wrote: > > > > No. It is not possible in Unity or, at least, it was not possible > > in Unity at the time when Ubuntu 12.04 was released. They really > > *forced* their users to accept the new place of the closing window > > frame button and have argued that it is more ergonomic. > > > > There was not any possibility to change the place of the closing > > window frame button in Unity via configuration options. Quite a > > lot of Ubuntu users complained about it yet in Ubuntu 10.04, > > where the new place of that button was a new default though > > it was possible to change it back via configuration options. > > In Unity, it was absolutely impossible. > > > Try Lubuntu, with LXDE. Thank you, but I have already tried Gentoo with xfce4. :) P.S. Actually, I have tried Lubuntu in my VirtualBox on Gentoo and did not liked it. May be Xubuntu would be a decent choice if I would like to return to pre-compiled commercial distribution but I much more like Gentoo with xfce4 now.