From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-160119-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCE7138A1A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:13:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16E98E0AC8;
	Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:12:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B812EE0A59
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:12:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.4.5] (blfd-4d08245d.pool.mediaways.net [77.8.36.93])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: hasufell)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71E41340543
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:12:56 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <54727804.5060205@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 01:12:52 +0100
From: hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.8.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo's future directtion ?
References: <op5uW-6vB-17@gated-at.bofh.it>	<op5uW-6vB-19@gated-at.bofh.it>	<op5uW-6vB-21@gated-at.bofh.it>	<op5uW-6vB-23@gated-at.bofh.it>	<op5uW-6vB-25@gated-at.bofh.it>	<op5uW-6vB-15@gated-at.bofh.it>	<opcd3-84i-7@gated-at.bofh.it>	<5470D229.7000806@tampabay.rr.com>	<5470DBF5.1060304@gentoo.org>	<CAGfcS_=we+kk4i+tV6jwVi+K=6GNe3-N2N8baigDY5ndrbp_5w@mail.gmail.com>	<547111B5.2030909@gentoo.org>	<CAGfcS_=0rhQB4aMq5ajvS-R0rqGtVEY_ZX-UE4Ckp06+PcaR1w@mail.gmail.com>	<547264C8.7030704@gentoo.org> <CAGfcS_mE32H_9pCr+g1KFyM6P4ZZMk_yytK+o=XYA7hD7wSYwA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_mE32H_9pCr+g1KFyM6P4ZZMk_yytK+o=XYA7hD7wSYwA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 58a65410-1682-40e4-973f-0fe8c2c5acca
X-Archives-Hash: 906358adb8fd21c3ce638606b6a8649e

On 11/24/2014 12:24 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> * kickban major assholes from the community, no matter how efficient
>> they are
> 
> Proposals welcome.  Hint, things will go much better if you volunteer
> to do the work the assholes are doing...  It isn't like we aren't all
> tired of this stuff, but if we go booting half the devs then the
> distro will basically die.
> 

That's actually an argument FOR my proposal of being more distributed
and shrinking the dev community.

In such a scenario we would not need 200 "gentoo developers" anymore.