From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-160108-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08478138A1A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 21:15:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C3E7E0AEB;
	Sun, 23 Nov 2014 21:15:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com (mail-wg0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9A8DE0AA8
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 21:15:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id l18so10793163wgh.2
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:15:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=aTC+ZvE2IxP1dhQnhECy17JRLx8JckrG8P5MSP4EY8U=;
        b=MACIWewjggVgo66XnOhgmPR7ElazsQkYw4koszLM6DNuXg1jzEJZs4ZP4bbbdps8kT
         vp65fGV972d3sEcEVUcUyp/sxuXE6tj5hTFxIRaGYPjaGdqYenqf7vdf5rh5dQDyRnvq
         ZSIo2WLP2RdBPEB/MLP+d+seWtDYw8yNzyIZXatCwcniyYYDBYyilLD1cqhyp3kut04m
         9Pc3L5xUIHzXRdiPjzfYlzQ7LSKRzLbUsztGY5HeH08XsnZelpCkqVCK3XoI8oep+Rm6
         lgXaBTKE9jLzNPTnL+Og7iGkiFoDLuFxJAno697XN0U/++15vbyTSqnkSf48UEMErZlw
         9yaA==
X-Received: by 10.180.93.37 with SMTP id cr5mr16076892wib.76.1416777322628;
        Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:15:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.20.0.41] (105-237-217-13.access.mtnbusiness.co.za. [105.237.217.13])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wa10sm18173193wjc.8.2014.11.23.13.15.20
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:15:22 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54724E50.4060402@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 23:14:56 +0200
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo's future directtion ?
References: <opcd3-84i-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <5470D229.7000806@tampabay.rr.com> <5470DBF5.1060304@gentoo.org> <CAGfcS_=we+kk4i+tV6jwVi+K=6GNe3-N2N8baigDY5ndrbp_5w@mail.gmail.com> <547111B5.2030909@gentoo.org> <CAGfcS_=0rhQB4aMq5ajvS-R0rqGtVEY_ZX-UE4Ckp06+PcaR1w@mail.gmail.com> <20141123151825.GA2139@vidovic.ultras.lan> <5471FDE1.2040108@googlemail.com> <20141123173348.GB2139@vidovic.ultras.lan> <CAGfcS_nuKrqr1A4O1iZQCLYR0R8YL7r4YLeBTHkAsyK9CV=3Gg@mail.gmail.com> <20141123205411.GE2139@vidovic.ultras.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20141123205411.GE2139@vidovic.ultras.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: d234effc-2e21-43eb-b4e6-e13a36fa2533
X-Archives-Hash: 26f58d78f7e007d4c58098a713062276

On 23/11/2014 22:54, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 02:30:12PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht
>> <nicolas.s-dev@laposte.net> wrote:
>>> Portage should support a way to expose ALL the conditions for a software
>>> to work and update installed libraries to match the requirements.
>>
>> This sounds nice in principle, but making it work is not trivial.
>>
>> Suppose my package works with gcc-1.2.3.4 with a list of 14 specific
>> patches and no others, and glibc-1.2.3.4 with another list of 14
>> patches and no others.  Now suppose 300 other packages have similar
>> requirements.
> 
> To make it simple, this is almost irrelevant IMHO.


I'll tell you what I'm seeing.

I'm seeing a theoretical description of magic software that mathematics
predicts can exist. I don't see running software.

How about you write running software that does what you describe, then
we can talk more, m'kay?




-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com