From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-160093-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21208138A1A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 19:15:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 315EBE091F;
	Sun, 23 Nov 2014 19:15:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB914E0883
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 19:15:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n3so3712276wiv.17
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 11:15:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=/NdReWtNi9XWjpIz9ipjHKQU+q7netgdw2c4whi5jDQ=;
        b=G8iP0zOCHE4XtR+xgXwRVeprpgfHterqV/ZoOT9x6ZEJYY3LZGPjJFNMgfWfUWHaAD
         RhzkSYtYDxg2kQWL3wM/Lp3bSIekfog5goOvx9gR0afMIrGnyPMC/DQlRBTEr/uiJThe
         HecY/nHClPQShPs7njaZCIbMKYjpwodxc+1FJJNSQ42H6RMCV1zfU44TYaHtnWFtZ2kJ
         +Uzm/ZLJzktEJx60fH1yGmGstqFmkbirrttpSLETwbXSoKTmJNEUaotbJ/eqSTrqJYuY
         GdlsOsdzTiCMqY07wFlPH0IkGmi+m3KhwscnRhNmaxogmludpYE7sMo3UhWxD0n00oNu
         ATeg==
X-Received: by 10.194.90.112 with SMTP id bv16mr27713205wjb.122.1416770127625;
        Sun, 23 Nov 2014 11:15:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] (p4FC12258.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.193.34.88])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g16sm17726693wjq.20.2014.11.23.11.15.27
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Sun, 23 Nov 2014 11:15:27 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5472324E.3080406@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 20:15:26 +0100
From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo's future directtion ?
References: <opcd3-84i-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <5470D229.7000806@tampabay.rr.com> <5470DBF5.1060304@gentoo.org> <CAGfcS_=we+kk4i+tV6jwVi+K=6GNe3-N2N8baigDY5ndrbp_5w@mail.gmail.com> <547111B5.2030909@gentoo.org> <CAGfcS_=0rhQB4aMq5ajvS-R0rqGtVEY_ZX-UE4Ckp06+PcaR1w@mail.gmail.com> <20141123151825.GA2139@vidovic.ultras.lan> <5471FDE1.2040108@googlemail.com> <20141123173348.GB2139@vidovic.ultras.lan> <54722696.2030803@googlemail.com> <20141123185416.GD2139@vidovic.ultras.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20141123185416.GD2139@vidovic.ultras.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: f8d94411-a3c7-443d-a597-0891920567d3
X-Archives-Hash: 7c4aaa5d187fe9390f15354d4f07323d

Am 23.11.2014 um 19:54 schrieb Nicolas Sebrecht:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 07:25:26PM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>
>> and you want portage to finish on this site of eternity when looking for
>> dependency resolution?
> I don't think having exposed requirements would explode the time needed
> to calculate the dependency tree because this does not add paths to the
> tree. It only validates or invalidates paths.
>
> And if time for dependency resolution would become a real problem, there
> are ways to solve that. One could be making pre-calcultated caches of
> parts of tree/paths.
>

which works so well with different useflags.

portage is already almost unbearable slow. The 'distributed model' would
add so much complexity, we can forget USE.

For what gains?