From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21208138A1A for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 19:15:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 315EBE091F; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 19:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB914E0883 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 19:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n3so3712276wiv.17 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 11:15:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/NdReWtNi9XWjpIz9ipjHKQU+q7netgdw2c4whi5jDQ=; b=G8iP0zOCHE4XtR+xgXwRVeprpgfHterqV/ZoOT9x6ZEJYY3LZGPjJFNMgfWfUWHaAD RhzkSYtYDxg2kQWL3wM/Lp3bSIekfog5goOvx9gR0afMIrGnyPMC/DQlRBTEr/uiJThe HecY/nHClPQShPs7njaZCIbMKYjpwodxc+1FJJNSQ42H6RMCV1zfU44TYaHtnWFtZ2kJ +Uzm/ZLJzktEJx60fH1yGmGstqFmkbirrttpSLETwbXSoKTmJNEUaotbJ/eqSTrqJYuY GdlsOsdzTiCMqY07wFlPH0IkGmi+m3KhwscnRhNmaxogmludpYE7sMo3UhWxD0n00oNu ATeg== X-Received: by 10.194.90.112 with SMTP id bv16mr27713205wjb.122.1416770127625; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 11:15:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.178.21] (p4FC12258.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.193.34.88]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g16sm17726693wjq.20.2014.11.23.11.15.27 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Nov 2014 11:15:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5472324E.3080406@googlemail.com> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 20:15:26 +0100 From: Volker Armin Hemmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo's future directtion ? References: <5470D229.7000806@tampabay.rr.com> <5470DBF5.1060304@gentoo.org> <547111B5.2030909@gentoo.org> <20141123151825.GA2139@vidovic.ultras.lan> <5471FDE1.2040108@googlemail.com> <20141123173348.GB2139@vidovic.ultras.lan> <54722696.2030803@googlemail.com> <20141123185416.GD2139@vidovic.ultras.lan> In-Reply-To: <20141123185416.GD2139@vidovic.ultras.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: f8d94411-a3c7-443d-a597-0891920567d3 X-Archives-Hash: 7c4aaa5d187fe9390f15354d4f07323d Am 23.11.2014 um 19:54 schrieb Nicolas Sebrecht: > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 07:25:26PM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > >> and you want portage to finish on this site of eternity when looking for >> dependency resolution? > I don't think having exposed requirements would explode the time needed > to calculate the dependency tree because this does not add paths to the > tree. It only validates or invalidates paths. > > And if time for dependency resolution would become a real problem, there > are ways to solve that. One could be making pre-calcultated caches of > parts of tree/paths. > which works so well with different useflags. portage is already almost unbearable slow. The 'distributed model' would add so much complexity, we can forget USE. For what gains?