From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A494C138A1A for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 19:11:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9579E09A6; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 19:11:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a69.g.dreamhost.com (sub5.mail.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.129]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897B9E0998 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 19:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a69.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a69.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07626400F073E for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 11:11:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=libertytrek.org; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= libertytrek.org; bh=zU6dh2qekpCc42FxwMZ+51dKpCU=; b=Tdxw7hkr1hLz +IMCUhlDnQ2u8x0TTyPHa5b6IjQ//d0DZlO6KprQ/mtMVVYPTRrot0TSBvjDxV1f 5a6O4DiKrwaZ3DvdGl2GnTgb38JPCQsaiPoJcivmQeDWq8l+ZbuLOz6FpkDqYUJm Kc1aQdPar9mdxVUNBji54HA8GNzBUK8= Received: from [192.168.1.110] (unknown [159.63.145.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tanstaafl@libertytrek.org) by homiemail-a69.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA102400DBB15 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 11:11:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5472314E.4040708@libertytrek.org> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 14:11:10 -0500 From: Tanstaafl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] The future of linux, and Gentoo specifically now References: <546EE70C.2050506@yourstruly.sx> <54721CEC.1020902@libertytrek.org> <20141123200249.413b1e22@marcec.fritz.box> In-Reply-To: <20141123200249.413b1e22@marcec.fritz.box> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 7c44fbd3-e5f6-4637-ac22-527b25c17e4b X-Archives-Hash: 4a56b4a047706552dc95ced51c8adf72 On 11/23/2014 2:02 PM, Marc Joliet wrote: > I get the distinct feeling that you two should probably read the LWN article > again. No need... This: "In the end, it comes down to this: it just is not that important. It is just a system initialization utility." simply proves that the author either doesn't have a clue what systemd is, or is attempting to obfuscate what it really is. It is *much* more than '/just a system initialization utility', and in fact, all of the brou-ha-ha is *because* of this fact.