From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A47138A1A for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A277E0AF2; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:35:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a50.g.dreamhost.com (sub5.mail.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.129]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F197DE0AE7 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:35:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a50.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a50.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E13862F for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 10:35:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=libertytrek.org; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= libertytrek.org; bh=vuv+rIYNSVHlzzCyf0B2kUkKa6s=; b=gR7flibzqfS2 DwGLBaQDSbuSHVdXML/bO+lACWYFlOYMM4rk+9QidKpmhJjilTZp5ivo00wbhvm6 udImPXYrYVaIKyVzT3uyp5N1FpX/nDoT7yui1EhHfUnhzvxneStAleBKCIlGnFwv SX44ul94iP++mZi7pcaJKXLNOywShq4= Received: from [192.168.1.110] (unknown [159.63.145.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tanstaafl@libertytrek.org) by homiemail-a50.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3486A862E for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 10:35:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <547228FC.6080703@libertytrek.org> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:35:40 -0500 From: Tanstaafl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: The future of linux, and Gentoo specifically now References: <546EE70C.2050506@yourstruly.sx> <54721CEC.1020902@libertytrek.org> <20141123180055.GC2139@vidovic.ultras.lan> In-Reply-To: <20141123180055.GC2139@vidovic.ultras.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 24079c22-ec99-460e-95a1-5611cced7e82 X-Archives-Hash: 8e14a8623cd6c67bfe0300be50a61667 On 11/23/2014 1:00 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 12:44:12PM -0500, Tanstaafl wrote: >> Since OpenRC is the *default* - for now at least - it is *king*, and >> systemd is the red-headed step-child, and as such OpenRC is and will be >> 100% fully supported. >> >> With that in mind, it is also 100% on the *systemd proponents* to make >> sure that *systemd* is 'fully supported' as an *alternate* init system. > > You're wrong. Really? OpenRC isn't the default init system for Gentoo? Prove it... > At first, Gentoo does with what software maintainers offer. Irrelevant. Since OpenRC is the default init system, any package that doesn't work properly with it would, by definition, be a bug that must be fixed - if the maintainer wants their package to be marked as stable/usable by 99.99% of gentoo users.