From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF70138825 for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 19:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16016E0900; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 19:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from postler.lichtfels.com (postler.lichtfels.com [78.46.92.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C071DE0845 for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 19:08:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postler.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D44123D0 for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 20:08:18 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xunil.at; s=mailout; t=1415473698; bh=oyTBoGtLkpieZiOTrGhHHk3GvnoiwPt+9MDFZDFrjaY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=mJ9mBOwTZVInywLpsIubreIsNcgyXMCs6GMmGeXzi0DbsXlkHbmudASEs5FgfLGIQ ojR3+B76fIpOqUx/WageQdjnB12hIS70ANQIAUOl62VTrvsEuou/KVkhT6YKs+ltr3 JByERH2RM9OM4N5XHtiri3yErJDawrlLi0xXeaAA= Received: from postler.lichtfels.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (postler.lichtfels.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with LMTP id 21618-03 for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 20:08:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from hiro.oops.intern (mail.oops.co.at [213.129.238.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by postler.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6522C123CE for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 20:08:15 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xunil.at; s=mailout; t=1415473696; bh=oyTBoGtLkpieZiOTrGhHHk3GvnoiwPt+9MDFZDFrjaY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=AyoTFsvL7vtb1yaVPR3XSd61QlZH41SEEoBzHMaJbs0B76FVsUtOn0fGJFz3qgSb4 qmY7GpEl0uMGmheYY/s7gxAYagbpQqmBtCBdb9yWqpsmZB1yxPEfn6gpe/G07deM3b QObTVBi1MH92BsJIVZClqxkuyzFFFLHsSobHqyyQ= Message-ID: <545E6A1F.7090000@xunil.at> Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 20:08:15 +0100 From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" Organization: oops! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc 4.7.3 --> 4.8.3 References: <1415384341.1753.0@smtp.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1415384341.1753.0@smtp.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2c X-Archives-Salt: 631d3722-eb95-4902-8f99-cafdcdb30f72 X-Archives-Hash: f22fdc77ee048a11a9c2d5d03d7034f1 Am 07.11.2014 um 19:19 schrieb Mark Pariente: > Going to 4.9 though is another thing. Apparently they broke the ABI for > the standard C++ library, so once you start compiling C++ stuff with 4.9 > you better go all in (I did @system @world with 4.9 and had very few > things that failed to compile[1], it's looking pretty good already). > > --Mark > > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=526140 I give that a try ... as I set up a fresh new btrfs-subvolume to do a fresh new build based on my @world only yesterday I will see if I can do it with gcc 4.9 while I am at it. Let's see if things work out and if it gets any better ;-)