From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-159646-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE17138B73
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun,  2 Nov 2014 15:59:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 76E09E0CBA;
	Sun,  2 Nov 2014 15:46:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-f45.google.com (mail-la0-f45.google.com [209.85.215.45])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46FB3E0C34
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun,  2 Nov 2014 15:46:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id pn19so3019283lab.32
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 07:46:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=DqPBBPk3rW833O/kRReBFxOe8qCeWSZMjabmrS9LZR8=;
        b=nz4vqyYDiUXkUoxx4Qu8O0qVgXXeX0DdAESC8eJvwdg6KNtMi+GhoyGCGUrrucpIu5
         JfCp3fiYz2moFzoCq6qAkclPq1BsQwWKidfKYjKm2WhxhIUhx/OEtyQCOqygQBmggqsF
         C1cVokUdLMJQi6FBiPfLDCO0KB515IJLME+uO7ChLZir4c5cv2LNdhiiGxZ9lxcjdsTU
         xdfWp6YAZPKbHRCQ4XAXWv4PS24eDmzknKY6s8mgBaX8zIwTY/Z8NI1AIds+KXy8RjZN
         d+7Fg5M2xPg3JhZ8C6fq+uynbhsrktmkSSQooPRHXfznfCldPvwP9UE+A+yzaF1uifGo
         uQEQ==
X-Received: by 10.152.1.130 with SMTP id 2mr43671254lam.89.1414943171480;
        Sun, 02 Nov 2014 07:46:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cosmo ([193.200.85.246])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lf5sm6863104lac.16.2014.11.02.07.46.09
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sun, 02 Nov 2014 07:46:10 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <545651c2.65cd980a.4a18.66e7@mx.google.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 17:45:24 +0200
From: Gevisz <gevisz@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] etiquette for stabilization request
In-Reply-To: <87tx2htz85.fsf@nyu.edu>
References: <87tx2htz85.fsf@nyu.edu>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: b87afa0d-bf39-42ad-b4b2-4e5e749a19a1
X-Archives-Hash: 08c022d9fd42e97028fed749db1dceea

On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 10:10:34 -0500 gottlieb@nyu.edu wrote:

> I am running firefox-24.8.0, which is highest stable (highest testing is
> 33.0).
> 
> Several sites, in particular mail.google.com, report that "This version
> of Firefox is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported
> browser".
> 
> Does that warrant a stabilization request.  I have never filed one
> before and do not have a feeling of what is considered justification.  I
> should add that other than generating the above complaints, firefox is
> working fine (including with mail.google.com).

I have exactly the same experience.