From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D7C1387FF for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EE60E0830; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16BC0E081E for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id d1so2507665wiv.6 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:41:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kfMHwS91K84QpIKL62XcoWHtgqGSP631JEOzGFo4DgA=; b=V676IS2RXa90qKH/6RhZnUb5guqf5i38uQFvZr0cPu2R6frA16HXnK5qVtcoAltTaM 6afy505a3U1f8dkkZbPaCMrck89+7S0sX+n+FCBDsjhAxjru9WuKjamgjEhz4NRm9VJI 2RIGrlGPP6Vs3aNKyCCI4rSZEaNiNiTptlm7LBHrVY+46uw9MT0btmFO+6PQyC/+3SkA 3TdJV0hehlz3gFQqwOT2VYDDqR/ftmKqL2DypXja3k2Tf1RSo5ckAB6pwxKiMb2Iw2Yc OoaViowrPqg2RTIxuASCWIxdOuWWQA6Fib9CxHesEzxjmVfpeKnSz0fJqJfnEweDF0fC DuSw== X-Received: by 10.194.94.162 with SMTP id dd2mr45649673wjb.73.1413913278853; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:41:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.21] (pD952CB03.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.82.203.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ua8sm16087081wjc.7.2014.10.21.10.41.18 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:41:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54469ABB.7050308@googlemail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:41:15 +0200 From: Volker Armin Hemmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gigabyte mobo latency References: <5442DAC8.2030106@thegeezer.net> <5442F17C.7040904@thegeezer.net> <5443A864.2030508@thegeezer.net> <544430E4.7050808@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: bf059bb8-eb5f-49bd-a1a6-6efc5b082152 X-Archives-Hash: d0f690c130f643a9c71e71098c6494dd Am 20.10.2014 um 01:34 schrieb Rich Freeman: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann > wrote: >> Am 19.10.2014 um 20:56 schrieb Rich Freeman: >>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:41 PM, James wrote: >>> As far as docs go - what specifically is unclear? Systemd is rapidly >>> evolving so things do get out of date, but for the most part stuff >>> like this can be found in man systemd.exec and such. Lennart's series >>> of blog posts on system administration using systemd is a very good >>> place to start. -- Rich >> and you are fine with that? That the package that becomes Pid1 is such >> an unstable, ever involving mess that not even the docs are keeping up >> with it? > If I wasn't fine with it I'd hardly be running Gentoo. :) You just > described half of the distro, though it isn't changing as rapidly as > it used to. > > Most of the issues are in the init scripts, which technically aren't > really part of systemd. It is fairly immature everywhere. If you > want a really stable experience then you should probably stick with > RHEL or Debian Stable. :) > >> You just gave me another reason not to use systemd. >> > Sounds like you didn't really need one. It is a free country - you're > no more required to run systemd than any Gentoo developer is required > to fix openrc init scripts or systemd units... > > -- > Rich > > . > you make that sound like a threat. But that does not work with me ;) I have dealt with Slackware in the past. Had no probs back then, why should I be scared now?