From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-96684-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1MFGa8-0006GE-6Q
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:54:48 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1645FE0469;
Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:54:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ew0-f224.google.com (mail-ew0-f224.google.com [209.85.219.224])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74CEE0469
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:54:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so688908ewy.34
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=qs3Au80FE0cDyi4Ke+di7L3985np77+TpreCHw4bCn0=;
b=MX1zNP04s29fFLqkKJssP3qw9e1iLbCp9xoN0Pgkhb5p54a0bc5a/cq2c8eXheK1Xh
f4l2dP2Dv4wb3j+F+BDzVpJgq9HuiSPO6sgNdYuE+WPw6ld/6GaZLKFs5HGqpiX+AiQ1
s41rvfhwuGCkvAMxAaSOKPbbOb//hzA+4ZCeo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
b=jYUzlA4g8ot91kkev2wvYuRdt2Y0T6oO6GOkrYv5c9ygG3I725CrNeR2vTs39F13Ry
nODWk/wFfyM2C5+qdaGLFySkZM/8TTkhWCH9LMvatLg0LBEAxK2N9Sq4xopaEPF8KSN1
JcgU2JmqgxeRKWvgJp64mAlHxHzcZ5tS+rI6Q=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.10.210 with SMTP id 60mr1494228wev.81.1244850885779; Fri,
12 Jun 2009 16:54:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200906122258.27712.dirk.heinrichs@online.de>
References: <543f3b9c0906121324s2b7a2c97q45ab3dc603d23290@mail.gmail.com>
<200906122233.01587.dirk.heinrichs@online.de>
<543f3b9c0906121345h6d174c8ahf607051c0cc8a536@mail.gmail.com>
<200906122258.27712.dirk.heinrichs@online.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:54:45 -0300
Message-ID: <543f3b9c0906121654q26304495odea07b538aede866@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] kde 3.5 packages blocking each other
From: Francisco Ares <frares@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364d31f9d85fbc046c2f6e68
X-Archives-Salt: 117f03d1-a34d-48ce-b05b-52678cf8b3a9
X-Archives-Hash: 1644b0b6eefff1bb38587f902fff4a21
--0016364d31f9d85fbc046c2f6e68
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thanks a lot!
Francisco
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinrichs@online.de>wrote:
> Am Freitag 12 Juni 2009 22:45:49 schrieb Francisco Ares:
>
> > And how do I tell if an ebuild is monolithic or not?
>
> The monolithic ones install larger parts of KDE, and usually have the same
> names as the original source packages offered at KDE.org.
>
> The split ebuilds, well, split those packages into their individual
> applications, so you have ebuilds for konqueror (which is also part of
> kdenetwork) or kmail (kdepim). In addition, there are the "-meta" ebuilds,
> which have the same name as the monolitic ones, but with -meta appended
> (kdepim-meta). Those usually install the same applications than monolithic
> ebuilds, but as split ebuilds.
>
> So, when you install kde, you get a complete KDE from monolithic ebuilds
> and
> when you install kde-meta, you get a complete KDE from split ebuilds.
>
> That's also the reason why they block each other. When you have kdepim
> installed, you already got kmail, so you shouldn't install kmail from the
> split ebuild again.
>
> HTH...
>
> Dirk
>
>
>
--
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples then you
and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have one
idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas." -
George Bernard Shaw
--0016364d31f9d85fbc046c2f6e68
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks a lot!<br><br>Francisco<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Ju=
n 12, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Dirk Heinrichs <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mail=
to:dirk.heinrichs@online.de">dirk.heinrichs@online.de</a>></span> wrote:=
<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, =
204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Am Freitag 12 Jun=
i 2009 22:45:49 schrieb Francisco Ares:<br>
<div class=3D"im"><br>
> And how do I tell if an ebuild is monolithic or not?<br>
<br>
</div>The monolithic ones install larger parts of KDE, and usually have the=
same<br>
names as the original source packages offered at KDE.org.<br>
<br>
The split ebuilds, well, split those packages into their individual<br>
applications, so you have ebuilds for konqueror (which is also part of<br>
kdenetwork) or kmail (kdepim). In addition, there are the "-meta"=
ebuilds,<br>
which have the same name as the monolitic ones, but with -meta appended<br>
(kdepim-meta). Those usually install the same applications than monolithic<=
br>
ebuilds, but as split ebuilds.<br>
<br>
So, when you install kde, you get a complete KDE from monolithic ebuilds an=
d<br>
when you install kde-meta, you get a complete KDE from split ebuilds.<br>
<br>
That's also the reason why they block each other. When you have kdepim<=
br>
installed, you already got kmail, so you shouldn't install kmail from t=
he<br>
split ebuild again.<br>
<br>
HTH...<br>
<font color=3D"#888888"><br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Dirk<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br>"If you hav=
e an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples then you and I will s=
till each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have one idea and w=
e exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas." - George=
Bernard Shaw<br>
--0016364d31f9d85fbc046c2f6e68--