Re: [gentoo-user] has anyone tried KDE5?

[Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>]

Am 09.10.2014 um 21:38 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> On 09/10/2014 19:44, Francisco Ares wrote:
>> 2014-10-07 12:20 GMT-03:00 Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com
>> <mailto:michaelkintzios@gmail.com>>:
>>
>>     On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 15:48:33 Philip Webb wrote:
>>     > 141007 Pavel Volkov wrote:
>>     > > On Sunday, October 5, 2014 9:10:50 PM MSK, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>     > >> I haven't used konqueror as a browser in many many months,
>>     > >> I get along just fine with Firefox and Chromium.
>>     > >> I believe Konqueror is essentially unmaintained these days
>>     > >> or at least on life support. Make a fine file manager though
>>     > >> (kparts has always been one of KDE's very much better ideas)
>>     > >
>>     > > I think there was a tendency to replace Konqueror with rekonq
>>     > > in KDE-based distros.  Can somebody comment on how rekonq is doing?
>>     >
>>     > I dropped Konqueror as an alternative browser recently
>>     > after it refused to accept every URL as malformed.
>>     > Rekonq is an adequate replacement + Firefox for regular use ;
>>     > I also use Lynx when I want text copies of WWW dox.
>>     > My window manager is Fluxbox.
>>
>>     I still use Konqueror as file manager, ssh/ftp/webdav client and
>>     occasionally
>>     as an Internet browser.  However, I have set it up to use WebKit as its
>>     browser engine instead of KHTML.
>>
>>     --
>>     Regards,
>>     Mick
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> How did you manage to get WebKit instead of KHTML?  On my version, I can
>> only see the last.
>>
>> Thanks, and Best Regards,
>> Francisco
>
> I set this up so long ago I forget exactly how I did it. IIRC it's as
> simple as
>
> emerge kde-misc/kwebkitpart
> konqueror menu -> View -> View Mode
>
last time I tried webkit it broke websites in interessting ways.