From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45805138247 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 20:31:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24F01E096D; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 20:31:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5F80E095F for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 20:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id n3so9148315wiv.3 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 13:31:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=05BrhZU21Sp4skZMT5npoFYe9ci+Ry1/fTaQiFAzjXE=; b=hoTOpYRLD+Cwto84nTEqxgfyxepvpG/PQO/Uk5daOWGuhwl81Vr9LSqXt7vguLGIZU ttJb+L4uDn1BoNWVkiARmI46P69dSi96mxjp9j/OvEXVe5fFfxy4YYx+rD5wx3J2xerc OOa3NVQbpQDCaMT6R7yrg10kk+3Mywi2LkKrJyockmiMrnm99WK3zledzJ8ZYSH8M6dt R9hNVLRRG3BqVgl9/37Q2SmBdajZorvxMP2xC/DKkcOVT0cE93B1sTfT89wS41H9eiY5 /mTLpL/Pf63f4zpdK4qKxggkjO1u3v86UYgnwPXzT6GdXq/Ex8qoM8Fx4YxGlTQ+Bv2k xmWg== X-Received: by 10.180.94.227 with SMTP id df3mr30135387wib.8.1412713900407; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 13:31:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.21] (p3E9E7993.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [62.158.121.147]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id di1sm16052297wib.21.2014.10.07.13.31.39 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Oct 2014 13:31:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54344DAB.8010206@googlemail.com> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 22:31:39 +0200 From: Volker Armin Hemmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: has anyone tried KDE5? References: <54318F19.1090701@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: abab4396-34ff-40db-8721-670417718e1f X-Archives-Hash: 7f091d7bbc32306698d4c16bcfdd6f8b Am 06.10.2014 um 11:57 schrieb Michael Palimaka: > On 10/06/2014 05:34 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >> Am 04.10.2014 um 19:37 schrieb Michael Palimaka: >>> On 10/04/2014 11:26 PM, behrouz khosravi wrote: >>>> Hello everyone. >>>> I was wondering if anyone has tried KDE5? >>>> Do you know when it's going to be placed in the main tree? >>>> >>>> thanks >>> Hi, >>> >>> The KDE release structure has evolved[1], decoupling the release cycle >>> of the Platform, Workspace, and Applications. This means that there is >>> no longer a single Software Compilation in the same way there was with >>> KDE 4. >>> >>> We (Gentoo KDE team) have not yet made a decision as to when the Plasma >>> 5 Workspace will be pushed to the main tree. I've been using it on a >>> daily basis for about six months, and consider the next release (5.1.0) >>> to be a good candidate for the main tree. >>> >>> The underlying Platform (KDE Frameworks 5) upon which Plasma 5 is built >>> is expected in the main tree in about a week, after the 5.3.0 release. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Michael >>> >>> [1]: https://dot.kde.org/2013/09/04/kde-release-structure-evolves >>> >>> >>> >> ok, at the moment you can't even install this mess: >> >> merge: there are no ebuilds built with USE flags to satisfy >> ">=dev-qt/qtwebkit-5.3.2:5[debug=,widgets]". >> !!! One of the following packages is required to complete your request: >> - dev-qt/qtwebkit-5.3.2-r1::gentoo (Missing IUSE: widgets) >> (dependency required by "dev-qt/qtquick1-5.3.2" [ebuild]) >> (dependency required by "kde-frameworks/plasma-5.2.0::kde" [ebuild]) >> (dependency required by "@kde-frameworks-5.2" [argument]) >> >> yepp, three ebuilds depending on qtwebkit with the widgets useflag - >> that it doesn't even have. Oh joy. And that after 2h+ dealing with other >> useflag related shenanigans. >> >> btw from the changelog: >> >> 25 Sep 2014; Michael Palimaka metadata.xml: >> Remove unused USE flag. >> >> that unused useflag wasn't 'widgets' by chance? ^^ >> >> >> > Thanks for testing. It appears I missed a couple of consumers (I did > check!) and it's fixed now. > > What other USE flag issues did you encounter? > > > so after spending hours fighting to upgrade boost, I finally got to the point were portage let me emerge kde-framework. I went to bed. I woke up 2h later... only 9 packages were installed, the rest skipped because of wrong gcc. Crap like that should be told right at the start.