From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-159126-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3284F13838B
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun,  5 Oct 2014 16:59:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81080E08F1;
	Sun,  5 Oct 2014 16:59:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32AAAE0875
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun,  5 Oct 2014 16:59:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id cc10so2621727wib.5
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 09:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=RpjulyX+fLMtYEnVgO0Oc/rf3xuYyYibWEa2+MyXd7A=;
        b=Jq4lYdIX5mG2HIJVqCy1g1cqVZ/EQEYLz4m/YXSff5F2rlQv5gag0dE+BhLhVF8cmH
         zPZogSO3o/w+tqyoSU2FMFMgmhgORUYeRlc3wJDJhTVmN8euukJ4K215HT1d5MKGgGDA
         BLQRUnUu741xytwKB+J67Ddb9URRK8bdAJezSsYGoWXpbBHUA+QF1EX3escAfj6fa3OR
         WYJQT59hNP6rYmEQEwhYE9kGIzxp8p8ieqY6x4ohDW/gNc1Qcc17yL9ZjbFJl/7DpwxY
         plZpJVnZllSNLKNAHqEyf9ub62W6PybyfZ+GxSDRxTnUhq03TvhPIzF7HGdUO8WQ3dm4
         B/Bg==
X-Received: by 10.180.208.68 with SMTP id mc4mr13414226wic.4.1412528372654;
        Sun, 05 Oct 2014 09:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] (p5B0C47E6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [91.12.71.230])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fx10sm8515572wib.12.2014.10.05.09.59.31
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Sun, 05 Oct 2014 09:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <543178F3.20505@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 18:59:31 +0200
From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: has anyone tried KDE5?
References: <CAO5-k+qo2D_7AAA9LMgbUwpvR5_6FyJKi+GyVeqKgrUVVc+nsw@mail.gmail.com> <m0pb7v$dm8$1@ger.gmane.org> <543144E8.9090206@libertytrek.org> <m0rmfv$3e7$1@ger.gmane.org> <54316546.7070407@libertytrek.org> <m0rpbq$67a$1@ger.gmane.org> <54317162.50508@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <54317162.50508@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 79382c27-3045-4d7a-9b17-cf6e5c8da428
X-Archives-Hash: a420215b37eff61ce4fb8adb72d52d53

Am 05.10.2014 um 18:27 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> On 05/10/2014 17:50, Michael Palimaka wrote:
>> On 10/06/2014 02:35 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
>>> On 10/5/2014 11:01 AM, Michael Palimaka <kensington@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>>> I'd be interested to know what KDE negatives you've
>>>> experienced/heard in the past though.
>>> Bloat, buggy/unstable ever since the move from KDE3 to KDE4 (and never
>>> really gotten any better over time), etc...
>>>
>>> But of course there are always haters too... I'm sure it isn't as bad as
>>> the loudest complainers make it sound...
>>>
>>>
>> There were definitely issues in KDE 4 early days but there have been
>> substantial improvements since then.  Regarding bloat/performance, this
>> biggest complaints seem to be about nepomuk/baloo. We provide the
>> semantic-desktop USE flag to provide the option of disabling this
>> feature wherever it's possible.
>
> People do complain about nepomuk/baloo, but in my opinion it's mostly
> unwarranted. The first indexing action did always take a long time (and
> so does mlocate) but once that's done, I found it didn't really impact
> the system all that much.
>
> My real beef is with akonadi and kdepim. I could never get the damn
> thing to actually work or to tell me what it was doing in a manner I
> could understand. The last straw was around KDE-4.4 when the importer
> managed to destroy my entire mail store and leave me with nothing, so I
> switched to claws and several years later switched again to Thunderbird.

or even better: akonadi eating 10 years and 100 000+ archived emails.
But the gains were there - search became slower, if it worked at all and
all filters broke - several times.

>
> I keep reading reports that kdepim is nowadays so much better and
> stable, but to be frank I do not trust it, and likely never will. I also
> understand this is not entirely logical, but it's just the way it is.

as long as akonadi with its idiotic database backend is around, it will
never be trustworthy.
>
> The rest of KDE I find to be very usable and rather pleasant to use. My
> sole remaining gripe is lack of stored sessions in dolphin :-)
>

My favorite fuckups which are still around:
tumblr can make konqueror hang at 100% cpu for minutes, because of some
javascript - firefox and chromium are fine and dlisted in one tab is
fine, but open one of their articles in a new tab and konqueror just
vanishes. Not even the crash dialog pops up.