From: Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@libertytrek.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: has anyone tried KDE5?
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 09:17:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <543144E8.9090206@libertytrek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m0pb7v$dm8$1@ger.gmane.org>
On 10/4/2014 1:37 PM, Michael Palimaka <kensington@gentoo.org> wrote:
> The KDE release structure has evolved[1], decoupling the release cycle
> of the Platform, Workspace, and Applications. This means that there is
> no longer a single Software Compilation in the same way there was with
> KDE 4.
Interesting.
Has this been discussed in detail before? What is the consensus about
this in the gentoo dev world? Meaning - is it a good or bad thing? I've
been thinking about giving KDE a try again, but still read enough
negative things about it to give me pause (my time is very limited so I
have to pick/choose what I want to spend it on)...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-05 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-04 13:26 [gentoo-user] has anyone tried KDE5? behrouz khosravi
2014-10-04 17:37 ` [gentoo-user] " Michael Palimaka
2014-10-05 13:17 ` Tanstaafl [this message]
2014-10-05 15:01 ` Michael Palimaka
2014-10-05 15:35 ` Tanstaafl
2014-10-05 15:50 ` Michael Palimaka
2014-10-05 16:27 ` Alan McKinnon
2014-10-05 16:59 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2014-10-05 17:10 ` Alan McKinnon
2014-10-05 17:25 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2014-10-07 7:24 ` [gentoo-user] " Pavel Volkov
2014-10-07 14:48 ` Philip Webb
2014-10-07 15:20 ` Mick
2014-10-07 17:27 ` Philip Webb
2014-10-07 18:26 ` J. Roeleveld
2014-10-07 19:20 ` Daniel Frey
2014-10-08 4:42 ` J. Roeleveld
2014-10-09 3:32 ` Daniel Frey
2014-10-14 5:50 ` J. Roeleveld
2014-10-14 19:22 ` Daniel Frey
2014-10-14 20:16 ` Alan McKinnon
2014-10-16 17:06 ` Daniel Frey
2014-10-07 20:18 ` Neil Bothwick
2014-10-07 21:32 ` Mick
2014-10-08 6:45 ` Pavel Volkov
2014-10-08 7:32 ` J. Roeleveld
2014-10-08 8:11 ` Neil Bothwick
2014-10-08 4:46 ` J. Roeleveld
2014-10-08 5:29 ` Mick
2014-10-08 7:30 ` J. Roeleveld
2014-10-09 17:44 ` Francisco Ares
2014-10-09 19:38 ` Alan McKinnon
2014-10-09 20:01 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2014-10-11 9:45 ` Mick
2014-10-06 15:44 ` [gentoo-user] " Jens Reinemuth
2014-10-06 21:47 ` Mick
2014-10-07 5:02 ` J. Roeleveld
2014-10-07 6:48 ` Jens Reinemuth
2014-10-05 18:34 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2014-10-06 9:57 ` Michael Palimaka
2014-10-06 15:55 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2014-10-07 20:31 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2014-10-08 9:56 ` Michael Palimaka
2014-10-08 17:38 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2014-10-09 7:56 ` Michael Palimaka
2014-10-09 15:40 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2014-10-07 7:41 ` [gentoo-user] " Pavel Volkov
2014-10-07 9:21 ` [gentoo-user] " Michael Palimaka
2014-10-12 12:11 ` Stefano Crocco
2014-10-12 15:20 ` Michael Palimaka
2014-10-12 18:45 ` Stefano Crocco
2014-10-05 12:19 ` [gentoo-user] " Paige Thompson
2014-10-05 12:20 ` Paige Thompson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=543144E8.9090206@libertytrek.org \
--to=tanstaafl@libertytrek.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox