From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0EC13838B for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 19:32:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E17C6E0AB9; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 19:32:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-f42.google.com (mail-qa0-f42.google.com [209.85.216.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A0D5E090B for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 19:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id dc16so5031913qab.15 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 12:32:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9ckUKiWHY62MlzhAxPNruv8Sejgt0JTKO1yak1SWlsk=; b=phiIPT3MGWpIZEHQDkaUlKL+QmrCjlhjK+fk6qte5G1hLHMFel83L3BEeL4iKnUByi p7qga09uTmhwhYpyTPrkl0uQYqqkE1PSr8vtgv4WlHo8P7uJ9tA37ZlQmkr9rCgHkeDu w4QYGU4nWP/Ctgp35VHBDuFj2LNeLznHw/Vr5JaulnnVTvinH3poa6j4eYEEg2ckGjuC +V/g9KJ3E0Hvn/CzQ4ZI7ZIrtI0Oq4gJrxph/IplEs+dxegeNfaojhLSfr3svpRdz973 NPcYbV7COOJ/55re7eizLQLsp/++ZkD0qRAXKp8+pSqazvjMYk/6obnaxMiZ/W5jptRI xOKw== X-Received: by 10.224.55.201 with SMTP id v9mr22699164qag.36.1411673552075; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 12:32:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-74-240-56-173.jan.bellsouth.net. [74.240.56.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j3sm2796709qai.45.2014.09.25.12.32.31 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 12:32:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54246DCF.0@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 14:32:31 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.0 SeaMonkey/2.29 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev (viable) alternatives ? References: <54245C36.50507@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 37b53fd5-0f64-4a80-9c25-95a7f1e7d00a X-Archives-Hash: 29841ff7c38a8dc09df501bb7f28c4b2 James wrote: > Samuli Suominen gentoo.org> writes: > > >>> Any other caveats (short term) on switching udev to eudev? >> in fact, from what I last checked, eudev's networking is at same level >> with udev-208, from time before the .link support at all > ah, back when ethernet defaulted to eth0 not "enp5s0" ? > Mine still does here. It's been eth0, eth1 etc for ages even after switching. I don't recall doing anything to keep it that way. > > James > Dale :-) :-)