From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1264613877A for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 14:06:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44F3FE0A83; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 14:06:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f170.google.com (mail-we0-f170.google.com [74.125.82.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E58DDE07A3 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 14:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id u57so549085wes.1 for ; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 07:06:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2agJhj39XQKsY8gPWsMH+xasx9Vqe8Q9xVVHnb1Bx/8=; b=Jkdo0AYBoAm1t5p2leEKsiumHv9R8nUaiFVJloF6ReC1hKd0/2X+/3HL78bI275suH bfGEWHf7lArutnjV1N24I0vGp9XHUJ2/9pv4ShCMolempdi5Ku4ZF/5iMNyabRdxPdjV ecGPhSkYghfOXAQmXD6TNuxzb6mvgpYRwuJRGouIlzHpk82yhhdTPrZmSxpT0OJjTgm4 YhC51N0lyvaHwNlUQNcJmG03A5G8jaKsnXvmjKMhDGB/Z5guGBZ5kdKaxFvaTnIS3NOG mdwcohoe7gZzrND+WQ0V2pQ42bqxBY6TYEWcUEiHrNXKJsm+hPRan8l4UtaGnq/u0U7V tZbw== X-Received: by 10.194.236.35 with SMTP id ur3mr582043wjc.127.1410012388589; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 07:06:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.0.41] (105-237-190-183.access.mtnbusiness.co.za. [105.237.190.183]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id iy10sm5269399wic.8.2014.09.06.07.06.27 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Sep 2014 07:06:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <540B14A2.2090603@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 16:05:22 +0200 From: Alan McKinnon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: MBR partition References: <20140906030219.GR7971@syscon7> <20140906031059.GS7971@syscon7> <540AA690.1090905@fastmail.co.uk> <20140906104456.GA23438@syscon7> <540B02AA.60401@gmail.com> <540B0417.9010401@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: bddadf8d-58c4-4a29-95a5-12c74648fa38 X-Archives-Hash: 78186be550f973dba4fce92e666f9cc6 On 06/09/2014 15:13, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> >> ZFS is the most resilient filesystem I've ever used, you can through the >> bucket and kitchen sink at it and it really doesn't give a shit (it just >> deals with it :-) ) >> > > Nothing wrong with ZFS itself, but keep in mind that ZFS on linux is > not the same as ZFS on Solaris as far as maturity goes. I'll admit > that I'm a btrfs fan for a couple of reasons, but when it comes to > stability on linux I wouldn't put either in the same class as ext3, or > even ext4 (which is pretty mature now). I neglected to mention - I use ZFS on FreeBSD, haven't used ZFS on linux enought o comment on that -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com