From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE2D13877A for ; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 06:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95888E08A4; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 06:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f51.google.com (mail-la0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6237FE0898 for ; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 06:47:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f51.google.com with SMTP id pn19so10895441lab.10 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:47:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1Qq6Ig4mHckbScpBBaMEd3iSEd6gE9+YhRL59hFbzBo=; b=mVZS/pG3OF0b4S5u+cEsy/MeGUsr7q2R79LnGEmTBKhfbzij7PHDkmtjKbWwCB7kvj u+Dei4Gu9Cq6434/7YrsgQXYCDVGrpTFuYEqdkhs8Pp5jmXYxar7mtoTs5N18Z7ESpnw VjqLBx48Gm8K1i98Z9Wf76i3Hf/2UaUKt3uunFppszxIMnJhi2UQjONY0rPzBaMID8rN te5go4mMGiutvPakOmTdLAmxRaWRa7lMP21wBcyAA7G3n0rJUJn6riGMm7wxVJpXXoe3 hYXxwuE4xLNSR488ZsXKw2jSh7aKx4uoGtEnxS6VS/i06r5cLmEeg/WYaJvr2EA5S3UP akTw== X-Received: by 10.112.172.38 with SMTP id az6mr8149849lbc.53.1408776459776; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:47:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (93-127-109-7.static.vega-ua.net. [93.127.109.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ap2sm15187151lac.22.2014.08.22.23.47.39 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:47:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53F8390A.2030601@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 09:47:38 +0300 From: Alexander Kapshuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-fs/lvm2 question References: <53F79274.2070000@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 3cbc55c2-43a6-41c1-aa44-c842460b84b2 X-Archives-Hash: 806a30b5c593c29e8d4afdf18eda12e7 On 08/22/2014 10:36 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Alexander Kapshuk > wrote: >> As I updated my system today, I noticed that 'sys-fs/lvm2' got updated >> amongst other packages as well. >> >> I don't use LVM on my system. >> >> If I understand it correctly, 'sys-fs/lvm2' is a required dependency for >> 'sys-fs/udisks/udisks-1.0.5-r1': >> >> equery d sys-fs/lvm2 >> * These packages depend on sys-fs/lvm2: >> sys-block/parted-3.1-r1 (device-mapper ? >=sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.45) >> sys-boot/grub-2.00_p5107-r2 (device-mapper ? >=sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.45) >> sys-fs/udisks-1.0.5-r1 (>=sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.66) >> sys-fs/udisks-2.1.3 (cryptsetup ? sys-fs/lvm2[udev(+)]) >> >> equery -q u sys-block/parted | grep device-mapper >> -device-mapper >> >> equery -q u sys-boot/grub | grep device-mapper >> -device-mapper >> >> equery -q u '=sys-fs/udisks-1.0.5-r1' >> -debug >> +nls >> -remote-access >> >> $ equery -q u '=sys-fs/udisks-2.1.3' | grep cryptsetup >> -cryptsetup >> >> /usr/portage/sys-fs/udisks/udisks-1.0.5-r1.ebuild:17,24 >> COMMON_DEPEND=">=dev-libs/dbus-glib-0.100 >> >> >=sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.66 >> >> What are my options, if I were to remove 'sys-fs/lvm2' altogether? > Remove sys-fs/udisks:0, which depends unconditionally on LVM2; also, > it's on life support, AFAIR. sys-fs/udisks:2 is actively maintained > and it depends only conditionally on LVM2. > >> What would you recommend doing about it? > What does depend on sys-fs/udisks? What's the output from "equery d > sys-fs/udisks"? Most applications switched to udisks-2, but some are > still stuck with udisks-1 (XMBC, now Kodi, comes to mind). > > If an application that you absolutely need requires sys-fs/udisks:0, > then you will need LVM2 also. > > Regards. Looks like I've got a couple of apps that do require udisks-1 to run: equery d sys-fs/udisks * These packages depend on sys-fs/udisks: gnome-base/gvfs-1.20.2 (udisks ? >=sys-fs/udisks-1.97:2) xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager-1.3.0 (udisks ? sys-fs/udisks:0) So I'm going to have to keep lvm2 then. Thanks.