From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED3713877A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 02:41:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 096A9E089E; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 02:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (mail-we0-f169.google.com [74.125.82.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7D62E0821 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 02:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u56so2037730wes.28 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:41:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DS2KXCW4eIhoCHehnkixLygjikUlp2kheGJat+HJXxw=; b=zbgRElsXnX+WHw/gRaykGKEGfE+J2b3qzKXdD4IQw6uZOAt3TkMiM+oRI9SzRHxAfI qo8JezJMEoyNn6JfdFa1lebx7+9x/PhgxP7CHpa1wD1XtTHNYChPuhaUZYK+QjrZIbO/ rwbuL+OofVBujjRzt1IgmYkTNttvND/OE/PqK9+vERDkeU6av0VXaIZHDOYRSzO2SHo1 bdL2rn0TgR9nOpmkPzqo0coU7s9kSaQiQtNxu6mQmwJ9MTewy0a28vpwppZl8iqzR57g Yh2q1SCY/+qyxlvEBLljaRKBVDZGukxctZfLQqHIy7PQcpuQ/8Lr197wLrXKX5b6s+5O iZDw== X-Received: by 10.180.20.15 with SMTP id j15mr12688701wie.60.1406774485410; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:41:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.21] (pD952DE61.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.82.222.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id sa4sm9953166wjb.45.2014.07.30.19.41.24 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:41:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53D9ACD4.2000000@googlemail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 04:41:24 +0200 From: Volker Armin Hemmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: USE flags handling References: <20140729201652.GA14289@waltdnes.org> <20140730160224.29830c66@digimed.co.uk> <53D93323.1060300@googlemail.com> <20140730200549.02099352@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <53D94C04.10204@gmail.com> <53D95636.5010401@googlemail.com> <53D95B6F.2020703@gmail.com> <20140730215928.499c51bb@digimed.co.uk> <53D98D3B.7060200@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53D98D3B.7060200@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ffe23ad0-298f-4cec-8e02-00e40d62ffb3 X-Archives-Hash: e89e1e714b411bcb19a88f833c66274c Am 31.07.2014 02:26, schrieb Dale: > Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:54:07 -0500, Dale wrote: >> >>> The biggest thing for me, is just stuff I don't use or ever see me >>> needing. At one point, can't recall version, KDE4 was a bit of a memory >>> hog. It seems they have cleaned that up a lot since tho. Even on my >>> old rig which had 3GBs of ram and KDE3, it wasn't to bad on memory. CPU >>> wise tho, I'd hate to run KDE4 on my old rig. It is just to slow for >>> KDE4. >> I used to run KDE on a netbook with 2GB and it ran very well. True, LXDE >> was faster, but it did less. Not doing stuff faster isn't a benefit in my >> book. >> >> > That's why I use KDE still. There are things it does that I like plus > my new rig is fast enough and has plenty of ram. My old rig tho, not > KDE4. I don't think I would even try it. KDE4 is the reason I built > this new rig. > > I do have Fluxbox installed tho. I have been known to use it a few > times too. It is so fast it is unreal. > > Dale > > :-) :-) > > > I occasionally tried razorqt or enlightenment or twm... and yeah, they load quickly. And then they are all useless for me.