From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B541391DB for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A747E0867; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:34:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42E30E084B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id f8so7380318wiw.1 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:33:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0nbTqpA+sP5oQTfrEo/CJBdNnIbXc+L9MCARoSv1Ztc=; b=KmMv2ap0m5Ry055BL2JLLJKDbw2KUNyIv1xic0pEnZ5ShMMCjqXJhlI5m0kJ7O+IGF pcIaES9mpGMDgAz9Kg0Ffatpimlxk7eUvAM3vlaZJis8jmmv6PIuIKVPhS6uBVaZKChS vbyKc2X+FRndGQZvXU+lydPG+kLRCxxZ2EKYXiHWG9otRUT4IM1xApAHFmnJGYFccqDh ki20vu5R04g+WMinTCXKjQoGnT84EjgPqdp9oD25zQTpzZ8mi+lU0FNbHh33BswPJkF+ JSr4NEOSXr5phqPZRe897gOETBCgwPhoolqjX6GjNdHRzk1FiAuuN/q+zT/rvFOqdUUR XPCg== X-Received: by 10.180.108.13 with SMTP id hg13mr7898014wib.28.1406738039936; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:33:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.21] (pD952DE61.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.82.222.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u7sm29130811wif.3.2014.07.30.09.33.59 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:33:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53D91E75.2010502@googlemail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 18:33:57 +0200 From: Volker Armin Hemmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ECC-ram, it is worth it. References: <53D3E7B8.5060908@googlemail.com> <53D4957A.50308@openmailbox.org> <20140729181812.GA25291@methusalix.lan> <53D8B78C.2080208@openmailbox.org> <53D8C56E.4010305@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 3635f76d-f5a9-4590-8cf4-b282ca89f95b X-Archives-Hash: b6963570e4897f6e1b38fe157ca3de9c Am 30.07.2014 13:25, schrieb Rich Freeman: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann > wrote: >> pretty easy actually. When I looked for ECC support, ALL Asus boards >> supported it officially - and a whole bunch of Gigabyte boards according >> to their forums. >> > Interesting, the Gigabyte board I'm using makes no mention of it. > Just something that needs to be considered up-front. > > It is still a constraint though - if only 10% of the boards support > ECC on the AMD side, then you're committing to an AMD CPU, and you may > find it harder to find the other features you're looking for (number > of RAM slots, PCI(e) ports, SATA ports, SLI/crossfire, clock control, > good price, etc). > > Rich > > Asus M5A99X Evo 2.0 had all I ever wanted. Plus something. My old gigabyte does not mention ECC either. But the Gigabyte Forums said yes. Seriously, it looks like you guys are making excuses ...