From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094551391DB for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 16:25:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62992E0B9C; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 16:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from postler.lichtfels.com (postler.lichtfels.com [78.46.92.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37C34E0AA6 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 16:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postler.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DA8123DF for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:25:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xunil.at; s=mailout; t=1406478328; bh=YA53Hua+ew8qLnXV0ish8wVbRTstrVibysVKkJVS9+E=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=eLFEUDWd3ZseZM2T2vwqt+dioNknmxnWtugiNHZGTScaX+1kz1ZcpRIqHfDiuIMvV x9qGLN0l+2rWhhpPWmDrUW51wJ1g9f5dHkQX1jdZSoPG2KjBuNIIveiIUwU89FEcu/ 7FqjJFDopQD0ZdfU3u8C2V1aagpLD0bjc8oIE58g= Received: from postler.lichtfels.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (postler.lichtfels.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with LMTP id 23204-06 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:25:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:15c0:65ff:8742:c03c:9395:4182:94c7] (unknown [IPv6:2001:15c0:65ff:8742:c03c:9395:4182:94c7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by postler.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A6BC123C8 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:25:25 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xunil.at; s=mailout; t=1406478326; bh=YA53Hua+ew8qLnXV0ish8wVbRTstrVibysVKkJVS9+E=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=zgwMqpMkB6ZAhwF/ylg0cJfBFqfOcwFCfnoZvVBCttlG3dHQAnw+dEwS3/lcnlZXn KA6AuTxIzElY2bO84FMZB+ZdMiEsGC6l7j3EJBS6ip721RChzc7XIilC+LHB6qqZyv 0zpm17Gcmnb8BOt3azh3mgO6VfZWarOPVGUBPbtQ= Message-ID: <53D527F4.5080108@xunil.at> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:25:24 +0200 From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" Organization: oops! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] NFS tutorial for the brain dead sysadmin? References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2c X-Archives-Salt: 0fae529c-54a9-4d73-8d14-405fa2c8bd1b X-Archives-Hash: d2fc5c79288001e1f934d29000796261 Am 26.07.2014 04:47, schrieb walt: > So, why did the "broken" machine work normally for more than a year > without rpcbind until two days ago? (I suppose because nfs-utils was > updated to 1.3.0 ?) > > The real problem here is that I have no idea how NFS works, and each > new version is more complicated because the devs are solving problems > that I don't understand or even know about. I double your search for understanding ... my various efforts to set up NFSv4 for sharing stuff in my LAN also lead to unstable behavior and frustration. Only last week I re-attacked this topic as I start using puppet here to manage my systems ... and one part of this might be sharing /usr/portage via NFSv4. One client host mounts it without a problem, the thinkpads don't do so ... just another example ;-) Additional in my context: using systemd ... so there are other (different?) dependencies at work and services started. I'd be happy to get that working in a reliable way. I don't remember unstable behavior with NFS (v2 back then?) when we used it at a company I worked for in the 90s. Stefan