From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-157409-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA50513877A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 00:25:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D760FE0C6E;
	Sun, 27 Jul 2014 00:25:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (mail-wi0-f176.google.com [209.85.212.176])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 975ADE0C14
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 00:25:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id bs8so2699684wib.15
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 17:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=KWG3APzk4JIe+tyxcPB6K9hxJ92u5jXTtyeA95Taw7g=;
        b=tsiPoyfseT/l/vrjkZH0gAa/gt9imBjspnifDqI067Sii6fw5gwkz8qp9wiun7hwKb
         lGZu0xaidqSXL6dE0HAQ+lTzH6tdy1QjdLZUpzxJxG8s3qyBNQVJc5n6oBOWWWflvHej
         l6OoaEDWBNXVOSn+MCEACMv3KItbV5yFDvBC/vphY1r1qXhhFpJyKYXLlBaH+cxS+QNU
         OWKauMDisoCvzahs0oMhnFmeyZ0iqjwW5cIuskmjaBRnwI39QbXLlPFKMMrHYcHWp6py
         uAHrfCzZCDKm1pkAnQGlTxI6UgthxOJNpfJResvlY5IUzBkYxTFqO9vNyRAaOqKWNSqF
         hfEw==
X-Received: by 10.194.236.35 with SMTP id ur3mr130577wjc.127.1406420746201;
        Sat, 26 Jul 2014 17:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] (pD952C4FE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.82.196.254])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id es9sm33200534wjd.1.2014.07.26.17.25.45
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sat, 26 Jul 2014 17:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53D44709.1040801@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 02:25:45 +0200
From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ECC-ram, it is worth it.
References: <53D3E7B8.5060908@googlemail.com>	<lr1bl6$uro$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAGfcS_m9Yeq-7JP9zpADRAHep=3ohuB3J5zwjmOub47Ncco--Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_m9Yeq-7JP9zpADRAHep=3ohuB3J5zwjmOub47Ncco--Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 83980e86-8e72-4c14-95bf-3f5ec01cca56
X-Archives-Hash: 3d29c46dde3e8c6fb82eed50afb438cf

Am 27.07.2014 01:07, schrieb Rich Freeman:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 6:55 PM, walt <w41ter@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is ECC memory a drop-in replacement for ordinary RAM, or does it need
>> a special motherboard?
>>
> It requires both CPU and motherboard support I believe.  The RAM
> itself isn't much more expensive - really just reflecting the cost of
> the extra capacity required.

AFAIK all AMD cpus support it.