From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A60A13877A for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 23:04:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CEF61E0E39; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 23:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EB4BE0DE7 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 23:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hi2so2632109wib.11 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:03:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JQlXzC3eGBaaursejxDwsUvXY7WUnvSwKRHjvE0t9wo=; b=gmZR94EBzmSZH4qlJEb5plcyI6Bh73zgYqNfJgiJOmKzTvEilFa8wTrQYNGTgSC13Q 3M64XcISWZXtr0FrP7uXq+YIB2tEJnOdpI7V44r1bSWuz1GoEVHaIE4O5cy3fP7Rp355 od0wQaHRTPZfN5EIxVJCae59XL9GKWhDh69r9d5zt8lIo5VgGw7e9PWqu0jutB315p9i Y1rWyuxPlRiTXjdoQE6K6P0vCtg47NaKbIYpg3Ikau4HpuPoXmBMVJ2Wykk9tYn0Yo5x Swuc+HvAqfQdZg1UPMzLGn8jQp/Q7khgtgBFNm4gSk058oO1U4zYI2YgaVlpWa1p3c/6 Q4fA== X-Received: by 10.180.89.34 with SMTP id bl2mr16657048wib.41.1406415830928; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:03:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.21] (pD952C4FE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.82.196.254]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h3sm36846060wjz.48.2014.07.26.16.03.50 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:03:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53D433D5.5070005@googlemail.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 01:03:49 +0200 From: Volker Armin Hemmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ECC-ram, it is worth it. References: <53D3E7B8.5060908@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1f02cb55-d996-4366-9e6d-2af2fea945de X-Archives-Hash: e8e932aa0b0dd62930514ac8d0f0e3d6 Am 27.07.2014 00:55, schrieb walt: > On 07/26/2014 10:39 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >> [894019.770058] [Hardware Error]: MC4 Error (node 0): DRAM ECC error >> detected on the NB. >> [894019.770084] EDAC MC0: 1 CE on mc#0csrow#2channel#0 (csrow:2 >> channel:0 page:0x2aa6ce offset:0xc60 grain:0 syndrome:0x63e1) >> [894019.770090] [Hardware Error]: Error Status: Corrected error, no >> action required. >> [894019.770098] [Hardware Error]: CPU:0 (10:4:2) >> MC4_STATUS[-|CE|MiscV|-|AddrV|CECC]: 0x9c70c00063080a13 >> [894019.770105] [Hardware Error]: MC4_ADDR: 0x00000002aa6cec60 >> [894019.770110] [Hardware Error]: cache level: L3/GEN, mem/io: MEM, >> mem-tx: RD, part-proc: RES (no timeout) >> >> and this, my children, is why I am using ECC ram. >> >> Using zfs showed me, that there are errors that the system does not >> catch but corrupts data. >> >> And this evening, with a thunderstorm outside I got that beauty above... > Is ECC memory a drop-in replacement for ordinary RAM, or does it need > a special motherboard? > > > > > depends on your motherboard. ASUS boards support ECC officially. You just put it in. With Gigabyte some boards support it, some don't - and they don't advertise it. But on their forums are threads about it. Rest: I have no idea.