From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2495313877A for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:23:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72B11E0FBA; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:23:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 439F1E0E48 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id n3so2485268wiv.1 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:23:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=i0iNPnMIncCNEWyjHQ/W+GEwlG7K97ormMRx4ggv6gc=; b=OTvSgluVybWQmgUfuL44OLsqgXOa/xZgXem9TwtJfcTq3R45hnKacI6c0VYtkWNAG7 68D495NsaMnk7Z8EejCiu0uBsz2hoiNl6ZlMt74psAxd1fhst+3KwTtq4WpqRGmYqaIt nRWE9c8BNRRX5QAWwn6Mgdpf/ZHT94KBw0fVStIK/eKK13FkaUO+mx++iSokdRrT6Idh NSrbw6MLdzC7G4sqcPVZTo4DD6pUuSS9Z/ul2KFIXw9ihtyKPDnmxWYIThNYXna7ZKrK SkiGQb2a3aUlXrBQPouyNiTzUhkZ6hUMZwV6lHdmjRzsbl6icx64shEludzzwy5HNrPS +rHg== X-Received: by 10.194.2.132 with SMTP id 4mr32420053wju.49.1406399001914; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.21] (pD952C4FE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.82.196.254]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id rw4sm35326163wjb.44.2014.07.26.11.23.21 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53D3F218.8040905@googlemail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 20:23:20 +0200 From: Volker Armin Hemmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ECC-ram, it is worth it. References: <53D3E7B8.5060908@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c879880d-861c-4b5b-a8c7-0c9140a6b6a6 X-Archives-Hash: cc744419c736fbbc0f152a23ace62a42 Am 26.07.2014 19:58, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: > On 26/07/14 20:39, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >> [...] >> and this, my children, is why I am using ECC ram. > > I don't really care if the porn I'm watching has one frame with > corrupted pixels on it. > > > but you will care when your kernel writes the next file right over the partition boundary.