From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08DC13877A for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:29:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD90EE0B56; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:29:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com (mail-wi0-f171.google.com [209.85.212.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A601E0B14 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hi2so2240446wib.4 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 05:29:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MS+kyA4ylx9IykJSbpA9/DVoh4v8EoPczyfn9CUM3Bg=; b=laroAszjZMaimrtjhr3sJ9R9D39OEn3ptjMLWg3IZC2+2ZUoexsY1i2w+KbY2H/Abn 30tC62m/g/UgSJEIAaxd4i1opTaqhhaPTdUJralg9NuWvXtNvIx7gbqeMZKnbYQI7+IO RQP0kEUPX+rpk3vyZjbeZ1oI1CZNqTsn0kmDEXv2Vr9PY8mxyvPSD74fVJpk84PugWp2 YwY6DeP/B0CaTOydEh1sWYZO8Hle2S5spROziPjypeHsggb5VKioymo60vgVfUF9gnnn vunQeZPHygX1v96kqTesB+qJlFoKBOhW3c3XG5x0EJxH2vZ8lRteKNoZSa+2HLhSoyA0 dvzA== X-Received: by 10.180.210.172 with SMTP id mv12mr13250932wic.14.1406377774148; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 05:29:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (213-154-212-42.static.vega-ua.net. [213.154.212.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ex2sm7014907wic.24.2014.07.26.05.29.33 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 26 Jul 2014 05:29:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53D39F32.5010501@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:29:38 +0300 From: Alexander Kapshuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] re: which NTPd package to use? References: <53D39983.8050706@gmail.com> <53D39C89.7040601@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53D39C89.7040601@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c05caf16-8c3c-412d-bf8f-6e2e41633c97 X-Archives-Hash: abd4e6ac269148fd30a9c825d08e9d72 On 07/26/2014 03:18 PM, Dale wrote: > Alexander Kapshuk wrote: >> Howdy, >> >> Which NTPd package would the list recommend using, ntp, openntpd, or >> some other package? >> >> openntpd seems to be easier to set up according to wiki.gentoo.org. >> >> The list's advice would be much appreciated. >> >> >> > I have used ntp before, seen others recommend openntps. At some point I > had trouble getting ntp and opentnpd to work so I started using chrony. > It worked. So, if you have trouble with the ntp options, give chrony a > try. > > My preference tho, ntp. Both seems to be relatively active so flip a > coin and see which works. :-) > > Dale > > :-) :-) > Understood. Thanks.