From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7AF01391DB for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C98F1E0BD4; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:18:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-f175.google.com (mail-yk0-f175.google.com [209.85.160.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B43F6E0BA0 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f175.google.com with SMTP id q200so3474759ykb.6 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 05:18:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xiCH+70uqulJMWca6PZP89AoRkgLHUA8gkNZat0Ftak=; b=QVsJyoMelQrSrpNcrfsjGRi9g0nqADeZnHYBwGeh+PdghKsj98aS99rznp5SYvTekJ lkbDzUhqPVh6c3nfhoshVAyaaL26kkOOQW863eo1DZG4rsyP2Pw0dhkvcgmdR8juOEKN tKUSqJFC768a9z733MFixYhLpK996EkUKTKrmN3r5I9s9xcSsVLgfmpz2gpFtHrumABl qetim7lPpjtZ+fhXzCUyAdPnMk9TdVQzNfdLQKF/X8wbbvTuRMXr94eQLOEFaWttjFO6 Ld3Qr4gvK/a14DwdLqbdjuijVKZgWECgx4ksTCC3gC3RgrkFpLBNZiH3IVh9kNqvfAWh Ba2g== X-Received: by 10.236.112.3 with SMTP id x3mr12167335yhg.17.1406377098790; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 05:18:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-122-210.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.122.210]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w48sm25826769yhc.7.2014.07.26.05.18.17 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 26 Jul 2014 05:18:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53D39C89.7040601@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 07:18:17 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] re: which NTPd package to use? References: <53D39983.8050706@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53D39983.8050706@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 3a105da3-88ae-481d-b670-e9bf5ea3f543 X-Archives-Hash: a3bd5712e19f960e85ee9e9adfa540f6 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > Howdy, > > Which NTPd package would the list recommend using, ntp, openntpd, or > some other package? > > openntpd seems to be easier to set up according to wiki.gentoo.org. > > The list's advice would be much appreciated. > > > I have used ntp before, seen others recommend openntps. At some point I had trouble getting ntp and opentnpd to work so I started using chrony. It worked. So, if you have trouble with the ntp options, give chrony a try. My preference tho, ntp. Both seems to be relatively active so flip a coin and see which works. :-) Dale :-) :-)