From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970A913877A for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:11:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 366F0E0B37; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:11:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-f47.google.com (mail-yh0-f47.google.com [209.85.213.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23886E0B24 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:11:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f47.google.com with SMTP id f10so3666197yha.34 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 05:11:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oZZFO/VHl4F1U98dDR7sPdULiayWFsnDas6Do6tpQvg=; b=S1L2kxJls6N1kniCPh+Cssl6BFdNOaofQwDZjHMPIpJqWpKdvLzQHq2vdCXs9+QXbf DTX/Z9ro2aZKwyY87VRGbJRk7oRssl5LFTzKgOmi3MBXXZ6DThsvGc45qDw7VPEriOEN b3PJkrNZJDCdT7NLqEugLz8ICsjA8LTbz6PpBEyOMb8C9numd5BEvg6eRX2kMYGgTg1c DVshWuTCk+aBteGRjPK9BXZ9DrEIv/SUbCiox5ifjn31zlgeSNcc8OUc65LUCD/MJ8pR 9TphJPR6U644nDvOgMs5mIFjIIkwdSDhyT0SWitg7jOTgCEiQB1kpiatgqQ+j8MK8Ucw WCyA== X-Received: by 10.236.91.74 with SMTP id g50mr32227577yhf.59.1406376710186; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 05:11:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-122-210.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.122.210]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f45sm25766273yha.53.2014.07.26.05.11.49 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 26 Jul 2014 05:11:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53D39B04.2090602@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 07:11:48 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Badblocks on my harddisk References: <20140726014915.GA3845@solfire> <53D39941.7040808@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <53D39941.7040808@googlemail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 28186214-cf14-4280-b933-3072b3e3f43a X-Archives-Hash: 9826b6be7fc9a2dba33fe7a3e53d8b80 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > Am 26.07.2014 03:49, schrieb meino.cramer@gmx.de: >> How severe is the problem? >> > first bad block? Not at all. Your drive's firmware knows about it, so > all read/write access should either generate an error your system can > deal with or will be mapped tranparently to a working reserve block. > > Since it is swap, no fs error occured and no data was lost. So... be happy. > > . > I wish I could have been that lucky. ;-) Dale :-) :-)