From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-157360-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D651A1391DB
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:04:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D24CCE0B6C;
	Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:04:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-f173.google.com (mail-we0-f173.google.com [74.125.82.173])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 951A5E0B62
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:04:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id q58so5446767wes.32
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 05:04:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=munBU9vjZvi0R1nQhwdhWX1tpxwsGJbPRLK5tVxURUA=;
        b=BfcUKYTubd4RMKxhJK+PxzA6VVAS9I0nmGkRZhr+b9hHZ4g20Uzs08J3u7m3lUJj7S
         Fd+mN1iKyo30nnnjdpVtnW0/ec4tQhQXhXfB3YoBcZYgnJH5HHXIJvPy6OTgMzn9H3Gb
         NuSyZCEN4m+X1iHf3aSmIIfHEQsRoAeRBLPgh53pyhW+73paj871/iXrEUN06axfPPQG
         iRW3rPcHhjcrCLDEKkZxU5vQ7AMxbHXxyH9HZA2I6XokI00j8HN/hKfcv8McRL4VeLy9
         kSQ9lf+htsP3/S1nvI9H97eQetRACSqCb1WaXJyGCQvZi8gQMkBiG4T5jn+bW6iJGAgf
         yd1w==
X-Received: by 10.194.123.105 with SMTP id lz9mr12747377wjb.122.1406376258251;
        Sat, 26 Jul 2014 05:04:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] (pD952C4FE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.82.196.254])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h13sm33239572wjs.2.2014.07.26.05.04.17
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sat, 26 Jul 2014 05:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53D39941.7040808@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:04:17 +0200
From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Badblocks on my harddisk
References: <20140726014915.GA3845@solfire>
In-Reply-To: <20140726014915.GA3845@solfire>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 51c5252f-3258-4868-922b-a44a1c9660f8
X-Archives-Hash: b7fcadde62a92a3390db05b2d14c0283

Am 26.07.2014 03:49, schrieb meino.cramer@gmx.de:
> How severe is the problem?
>
first bad block? Not at all. Your drive's firmware knows about it, so
all read/write access should either generate an error your system can
deal with or will be mapped tranparently to a working reserve block.

Since it is swap, no fs error occured and no data was lost. So... be happy.