From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0F61392EF for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 11:31:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF421E0FCF; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 11:31:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from icp-osb-irony-out2.external.iinet.net.au (icp-osb-irony-out2.external.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.218]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C8EE0FC8 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 11:31:52 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhUFABBLzlNqRRUb/2dsb2JhbABYgw5SzBuBVIFDAYEPFnaEBAEFbAoCEQsNCwkWDwkDAgECAUUTCAEBiD2/cBePUhaEMAWKZJBChxUpjHGDUTA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,710,1399996800"; d="scan'208";a="233447732" Received: from unknown (HELO mail.vm.localdomain) ([106.69.21.27]) by icp-osb-irony-out2.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 22 Jul 2014 19:31:49 +0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.vm.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A13600C93 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:31:47 +0800 (WST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at localdomain Received: from mail.vm.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.vm.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OzXl99MLmgDN for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:31:35 +0800 (WST) Received: from [192.168.44.7] (rattus.lan.localdomain [192.168.44.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.vm.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C0B2600C8F for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:31:35 +0800 (WST) Message-ID: <53CE4B97.9000406@iinet.net.au> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:31:35 +0800 From: Bill Kenworthy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] adobe flash References: <53CE2967.1010105@iinet.net.au> <1419565.3RCxVFKX0b@andromeda> <53CE44F4.3050501@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53CE44F4.3050501@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 9b649abb-2dcd-4ba3-a0b4-d6d274e75be8 X-Archives-Hash: 19eecb161cc3626d09437ac2dce51b4b On 22/07/14 19:03, Dale wrote: > J. Roeleveld wrote: >> On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 05:05:43 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote: >>> I have a couple of systems with flash that are always a pain to update >>> because the checksums fail so you have to manually force a manifest >>> rebuild first. As I have to update them anyway, is there a ways to >>> override the portage checksums and say install anyway? Because this >>> package always fails anyway, I cant see any security gain by having a >>> manual update every-time anyway. >> I would be more interested in finding out why it fails? >> I use adobe flash myself and never experience a checksum issue with it. >> >> -- >> Joost >> >> . >> > > Same here. I have it installed here and don't recall ever having a > digest issue. It could be that something is off somewhere. If so, I'd > rethink bypassing the checks. > > Dale > > :-) :-) > Hmm, that's interesting. Caused me to look closer ... I am pulling from http-replicator which doesnt update the package if it cant see a name change (and adobe don't change the name on the package - just the directory its pulled from) so of course it fails checksum. Thanks for the hints to track this down. BillK