From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8FC13877A for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:54:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0678AE0924; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-f175.google.com (mail-yk0-f175.google.com [209.85.160.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBD31E091D for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:54:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 9so3562740ykp.34 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 04:54:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EIWCznNjU+gImzRqtE9kGgpKPsBv7Uj9TO/2DSN+64Q=; b=LHp6FaqtWHCw6l6cgRBNBJl+20Dj8yD9GI47Gaw+T3+QqSgwTxOk3CeXKlL9M3I4aM HZRYZhdtxJUY9mLq+Kj715/5Bbci3blKi9td6zEEvvH7y6vsA/hhv48CRl5Ms5TwIsnl +4RGibKzwkX6j6BkWY4lmUOfMw3gIK8OmivroiBMVk/qSfPQoDUbrWOYKWUUcm8KKGus xgxiDHr67w3Qy2ssDjv2LwRtKOSCfHix9G+GSd6en3P/Yw40Uhw1O6k8EHl668+2WEef SMCoelISDCLm+THCy1jmy+HEEIr2J36AjJzplJX9KMnT/NsxUbfal7hoG6c2SXemT8AR citg== X-Received: by 10.236.131.42 with SMTP id l30mr107234yhi.130.1403956449032; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 04:54:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-95-206.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.95.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f20sm8997719yhp.36.2014.06.28.04.54.07 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 28 Jun 2014 04:54:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53AEACDF.9030105@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 06:54:07 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:28.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/28.0 SeaMonkey/2.25 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] smartctrl drive error @60% References: <53AA050F.4070907@gmail.com> <201406271422.28115.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <20140627215432.003491a9@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <201406280848.51796.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201406280848.51796.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 28c33f8a-eca4-4737-b823-c3db19a4129a X-Archives-Hash: 31188314d4da833e4e871e12e6ca4d58 Mick wrote: > On Friday 27 Jun 2014 21:54:32 Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:22:09 +0100, Mick wrote: >>> I would think that your ISP providers in the US will be blocking >>> outgoing port 25 to stop compromised MSWindows machines spamming the >>> rest of us. If you use my suggestion there shouldn't be a problem. >> It makes no difference whether you address it directly to your ISP >> address or via an alias. The ISP won't block port 25 connections to its >> own servers from its own customers, otherwise none of them could send >> email at all! > In the US many big players are blocking outbound port 25 for their customers > as a blanket measure to control spam from botnets, e.g.: > > http://www.verizon.com/Support/Residential/internet/highspeed/general+support/top+questions/questionsone/124274.htm > > If Dale uses the ssmtp.conf I sent he will be using a different port + TLS > encryption and should not have a problem. > > Even if Dale's ISP does not block port 25 for connections to the ISP's *own* > mail servers, it may well block it to other providers' mail addresses for the > same reason. This was a common practice some years back (pre-Gmail) when ISP > had started charging for mail services. > According to the settings in Seamonkey, it should be port 995 and SSL/TLS. I used your "basic" setup which is port 465. It works tho. :-) Dale :-) :-)