public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user]  smartctrl drive error @60%
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:15:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53AACB8D.6010300@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53AAA791.4050506@thegeezer.net>

thegeezer wrote:
> On 06/25/2014 08:49 AM, Dale wrote:
>> thegeezer wrote:
>>> this is pretty bad. 
>> Here is the output:
>>
>> root@fireball / # smartctl -a /dev/sdc
>> smartctl 6.1 2013-03-16 r3800 [x86_64-linux-3.14.0-gentoo] (local build)
>> Copyright (C) 2002-13, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org
>>
>> === START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
>> Model Family:     Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 (AF)
>> Device Model:     ST3000DM001-9YN166
>> Serial Number:    Z1F0PKT5
>> LU WWN Device Id: 5 000c50 04d79e15c
>> Firmware Version: CC4C
>> User Capacity:    3,000,592,982,016 bytes [3.00 TB]
>> Sector Sizes:     512 bytes logical, 4096 bytes physical
>> Rotation Rate:    7200 rpm
>> Device is:        In smartctl database [for details use: -P show]
>> ATA Version is:   ATA8-ACS T13/1699-D revision 4
>> SATA Version is:  SATA 3.0, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 6.0 Gb/s)
>> Local Time is:    Wed Jun 25 02:46:39 2014 CDT
>>
>> ==> WARNING: A firmware update for this drive is available,
>> see the following Seagate web pages:
>> http://knowledge.seagate.com/articles/en_US/FAQ/207931en
>> http://knowledge.seagate.com/articles/en_US/FAQ/223651en
> interesting - not seen that before might be worth a nose

I was thinking the same thing myself.  How does it know there is a
update was another question I had. 

>> SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
>> SMART support is: Enabled
>>
>> === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
>> SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED
>>
>> General SMART Values:
>> Offline data collection status:  (0x00) Offline data collection activity
>>                                         was never started.
>>                                         Auto Offline Data Collection:
>> Disabled.
>> Self-test execution status:      ( 118) The previous self-test completed
>> having
>>                                         the read element of the test failed.
>> Total time to complete Offline
>> data collection:                (  584) seconds.
>> Offline data collection
>> capabilities:                    (0x73) SMART execute Offline immediate.
>>                                         Auto Offline data collection
>> on/off support.
>>                                         Suspend Offline collection upon new
>>                                         command.
>>                                         No Offline surface scan supported.
>>                                         Self-test supported.
>>                                         Conveyance Self-test supported.
>>                                         Selective Self-test supported.
>> SMART capabilities:            (0x0003) Saves SMART data before entering
>>                                         power-saving mode.
>>                                         Supports SMART auto save timer.
>> Error logging capability:        (0x01) Error logging supported.
>>                                         General Purpose Logging supported.
>> Short self-test routine
>> recommended polling time:        (   1) minutes.
>> Extended self-test routine
>> recommended polling time:        ( 340) minutes.
>> Conveyance self-test routine
>> recommended polling time:        (   2) minutes.
>> SCT capabilities:              (0x3085) SCT Status supported.
>>
>> SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 10
>> Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
>> ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAG     VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE     
>> UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
>>   1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate     0x000f   119   099   006    Pre-fail 
>> Always       -       234421760
> you can happily ignore this error rate, it is usual for it to be high
> and htere is hardware correction for it
>
>>   3 Spin_Up_Time            0x0003   092   092   000    Pre-fail 
>> Always       -       0
>>   4 Start_Stop_Count        0x0032   100   100   020    Old_age  
>> Always       -       33
> 33 power cycles seem very low but further down we see the power on time
> is just under two years which is also erring towards the lighter side of
> the mtbf

About the only time I shutdown is when the power fails.  My puter only
pulls about 150 watts so I just leave it running 24/7. 


>
>>   5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   100   100   036    Pre-fail 
>> Always       -       0
> zero reallocated sectors suggests there is space to do reallocation
>
>>   7 Seek_Error_Rate         0x000f   079   060   030    Pre-fail 
>> Always       -       99909120
>>   9 Power_On_Hours          0x0032   082   082   000    Old_age  
>> Always       -       16379
> almost two years of power on time
>
>>  10 Spin_Retry_Count        0x0013   100   100   097    Pre-fail 
>> Always       -       0
>>  12 Power_Cycle_Count       0x0032   100   100   020    Old_age  
>> Always       -       34
>> 183 Runtime_Bad_Block       0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age  
>> Always       -       0
>> 184 End-to-End_Error        0x0032   100   100   099    Old_age  
>> Always       -       0
>> 187 Reported_Uncorrect      0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age  
>> Always       -       0
>> 188 Command_Timeout         0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age  
>> Always       -       0 0 0
>> 189 High_Fly_Writes         0x003a   100   100   000    Old_age  
>> Always       -       0
>> 190 Airflow_Temperature_Cel 0x0022   069   063   045    Old_age  
>> Always       -       31 (Min/Max 26/33)
>> 191 G-Sense_Error_Rate      0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age  
>> Always       -       0
>> 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age  
>> Always       -       9
>> 193 Load_Cycle_Count        0x0032   093   093   000    Old_age  
>> Always       -       14284
>> 194 Temperature_Celsius     0x0022   031   040   000    Old_age  
>> Always       -       31 (0 17 0 0 0)
>> 197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age  
>> Always       -       104
> 197
> this says there are 104 pending sectors i.e. bad blocks on the drive
> that have not been reallocatd yet

Wonder why it hasn't?  Isn't it supposed to do that sort of thing itself? 


>
>> 198 Offline_Uncorrectable   0x0010   100   100   000    Old_age  
>> Offline      -       104
> this says it was not able to reallocate. which is odd because of the
> entry 5 being zero

Uh oh. 

>
>> 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count    0x003e   200   200   000    Old_age  
>> Always       -       0
>> 240 Head_Flying_Hours       0x0000   100   253   000    Old_age  
>> Offline      -       15955h+37m+28.932s
>> 241 Total_LBAs_Written      0x0000   100   253   000    Old_age  
>> Offline      -       52221690631887
>> 242 Total_LBAs_Read         0x0000   100   253   000    Old_age  
>> Offline      -       74848968465606
>>
>> SMART Error Log Version: 1
>> No Errors Logged
>>
>> SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
>> Num  Test_Description    Status                  Remaining 
>> LifeTime(hours)  LBA_of_first_error
>> # 1  Extended offline    Completed: read failure       60%    
>> 16365         2905482560
>> # 2  Extended offline    Completed: read failure       60%    
>> 16352         2905482560
>> # 3  Extended offline    Completed without error       00%     
>> 8044         -
>> # 4  Extended offline    Completed without error       00%     
>> 3121         -
>> # 5  Extended offline    Completed without error       00%     
>> 1548         -
>> # 6  Short offline       Completed without error       00%     
>> 1141         -
>> # 7  Extended offline    Completed without error       00%      
>> 719         -
>> # 8  Extended offline    Completed without error       00%      
>> 525         -
>> # 9  Short offline       Completed without error       00%      
>> 516         -
>> #10  Extended offline    Completed without error       00%       
>> 18         -
>> #11  Extended offline    Completed without error       00%        
>> 5         -
>> #12  Short offline       Completed without error       00%        
>> 0         -
>>
>> SMART Selective self-test log data structure revision number 1
>>  SPAN  MIN_LBA  MAX_LBA  CURRENT_TEST_STATUS
>>     1        0        0  Not_testing
>>     2        0        0  Not_testing
>>     3        0        0  Not_testing
>>     4        0        0  Not_testing
>>     5        0        0  Not_testing
>> Selective self-test flags (0x0):
>>   After scanning selected spans, do NOT read-scan remainder of disk.
>> If Selective self-test is pending on power-up, resume after 0 minute delay.
>>
>> root@fireball / #
>>  
>> Does that help shed any light on this situation?   If you need more
>> info, just let me know.  Off to newegg.  BRB 
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> :-)  :-) 
>>
> 104 bad blocks is not a sign of a happy disk.
> i would replace urgently
>
> also consider running smartd or a smartmonitor plugin for munin as the
> test log suggests you last ran a test after the first year of usage
>
>

I usually just run the test manually but I sort of had family stuff
going on for the past year, almost a year anyway.  Sort of behind on
things although I have been doing my normal updates. 

I ordered a drive.  It should be here tomorrow.  In the meantime, I
shutdown and re-seated all the cables, power too. I got the test running
again but results is a few hours off yet.  It did pass the short test
tho.  I'm not sure that it means much. 

Thanks much.

Dale

:-)  :-) 


  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-25 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-24 23:09 [gentoo-user] smartctrl drive error @60% Dale
2014-06-25  4:20 ` J. Roeleveld
2014-06-25  5:05   ` Dale
2014-06-25  7:26     ` J. Roeleveld
2014-06-25  7:43       ` Dale
2014-06-25  7:41     ` thegeezer
2014-06-25  7:49       ` Dale
2014-06-25 10:42         ` thegeezer
2014-06-25 13:15           ` Dale [this message]
2014-06-25 14:03             ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-25 15:54               ` Dale
2014-06-25 16:09                 ` Neil Bothwick
2014-06-25 16:44                   ` Mick
2014-06-25 17:29                     ` Neil Bothwick
2014-06-25 22:16                       ` Dale
2014-06-25 22:32                         ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-26  2:07                           ` Dale
2014-06-26  2:15                             ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-26  4:57                               ` Dale
2014-06-29 15:17                                 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2014-07-01  8:30                                   ` Dale
2014-07-01  8:46                                     ` Helmut Jarausch
2014-07-01  8:58                                       ` Dale
2014-07-01  9:06                                         ` Helmut Jarausch
2014-07-01  9:11                                           ` J. Roeleveld
2014-07-01  9:21                                             ` Dale
2014-07-01 10:19                                               ` J. Roeleveld
2014-07-01 12:36                                                 ` Dale
2014-07-01  8:49                                     ` J. Roeleveld
2014-06-25 22:50                         ` Neil Bothwick
2014-06-26  2:15                           ` Dale
2014-06-26  5:56                             ` Mick
2014-06-26  5:59                               ` Mick
2014-06-26 14:14                                 ` Dale
2014-06-26 15:08                                   ` Neil Bothwick
2014-06-26 15:31                                     ` Dale
2014-06-27 13:22                                     ` Mick
2014-06-27 20:54                                       ` Neil Bothwick
2014-06-27 21:26                                         ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2014-06-27 21:41                                           ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-28  7:48                                         ` [gentoo-user] " Mick
2014-06-28  8:37                                           ` Neil Bothwick
2014-06-28 11:54                                           ` Dale
2014-06-26  7:22                               ` [gentoo-user] " Alberto Luaces
2014-06-26 10:11                             ` [gentoo-user] " Neil Bothwick
2014-06-26 11:03                               ` Dale
2014-06-26 11:24                                 ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-26 11:40                                   ` Dale
2014-06-26  0:38                         ` Bill Kenworthy
2014-06-26  2:31                           ` Dale
2014-06-26 17:39                         ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2014-06-28 11:55                           ` Dale
2014-06-28 12:40                             ` Neil Bothwick
2014-06-28 13:05                               ` Dale
2014-06-28 13:08                                 ` Alan McKinnon
2014-06-28 13:58                                   ` Dale
2014-06-28 14:15                                     ` Dale
2014-06-28 14:50                                       ` Peter Humphrey
2014-06-28 16:00                                         ` Mick
2014-06-28 17:30                                           ` Dale
2014-06-25 16:38                 ` [gentoo-user] " Rich Freeman
2014-06-26  2:13                   ` Dale
2014-06-25 18:44               ` Douglas J Hunley
2014-06-25 18:50                 ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-26 16:05               ` Dale
2014-06-26  0:00             ` David Haller
2014-06-26  2:40               ` Dale
2014-06-26  6:05                 ` David Haller
2014-06-26 16:19             ` [gentoo-user] OT: power requirement (WAS: smartctrl drive error @60%) Frank Steinmetzger
2014-06-26 17:05               ` Daniel Frey
2014-06-26 23:01                 ` Bill Kenworthy
2014-06-26 17:31               ` Dale
2014-06-25 16:55         ` [gentoo-user] smartctrl drive error @60% Volker Armin Hemmann
2014-06-25 17:06           ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-25 17:15             ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2014-06-25 17:44               ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-25 21:19                 ` J. Roeleveld
2014-06-26  3:45                   ` Dale
2014-06-26  1:16                 ` Daniel Frey
2014-06-26  3:54                   ` Dale
2014-06-26 10:05                     ` Neil Bothwick
2014-06-26 10:54                       ` Dale
2014-06-26 10:52                     ` Alan McKinnon
2014-06-26 11:20                       ` Dale
2014-06-26 12:57                         ` Alan McKinnon
2014-06-26 13:58                           ` Dale
2014-06-26 17:14                           ` Daniel Frey
2014-06-26 17:21                     ` Daniel Frey
2014-06-25 21:11           ` Dale
2014-06-25  9:46     ` Neil Bothwick
2014-06-25 10:05       ` Dale
2014-06-25 10:55         ` thegeezer
2014-06-25 11:02           ` Helmut Jarausch
2014-06-25 13:21             ` covici
2014-06-25 12:33           ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-25 14:23             ` Neil Bothwick
2014-06-25 14:29               ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-25 16:00                 ` Dale
2014-06-25 15:30             ` covici
2014-06-25 16:34               ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-25 17:58               ` Alan McKinnon
2014-06-25 12:30         ` Dale
2014-06-25  7:35 ` Marc Joliet
2014-06-29  3:27 ` Dale
2014-06-29  3:34   ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-29  4:44     ` Dale
2014-06-29  7:38       ` Mick
2014-06-29  8:42         ` Dale
2014-06-29  9:40           ` Mick
2014-06-29 12:05       ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-29 12:30         ` Dale
2014-07-01  5:52         ` Mick
2014-07-01  6:09           ` J. Roeleveld
2014-07-01  7:21             ` Dale
2014-07-01 10:48             ` Rich Freeman
2014-07-01 10:55           ` Alan McKinnon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53AACB8D.6010300@gmail.com \
    --to=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox