From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3CF13877A for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 08:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBA5DE0D45; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 08:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-f47.google.com (mail-yh0-f47.google.com [209.85.213.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6C2FE0D39 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 08:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f47.google.com with SMTP id v1so3418353yhn.34 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 01:47:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EDBZ7LPo3z2seeINnCJMiACAolyL5HrA4wG0rttIZKE=; b=QlhRsdz2lDKq1hc1H6TzH1QAaibu1YwZGZwZ2G1JI1DE3h91BFYllLrBR6E3TDmZCz BxlfulNQYf5ujs5CACLVWfVSn58CbAFTTx+VxYPvwGlvUHc+zGQmNe+Usp9loRnptgMt Ij8uxfFzXH87xIygImMUcK0q1qUmxwY10gJK/6hFeW4EuiKJ9j/gKRtw1/QKA7VeJnnu SOJCnZPguQcfbH+STCoZvvgX6Jt1nusngrTfKml9uNRfNfvxCiOmGSU09qVKm78aMiiB mjCSn6Q5RSeruTxFirMnzQRBaBt4UL2rmXQJYt+9dlYpg+V5rib9DolFWXQq/G5jy5go IpeQ== X-Received: by 10.236.124.238 with SMTP id x74mr688752yhh.137.1402822031842; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 01:47:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-130-128.jan.bellsouth.net. [98.95.130.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c25sm15095000yhn.3.2014.06.15.01.47.11 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 15 Jun 2014 01:47:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <539D5D8E.6080805@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 03:47:10 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:28.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/28.0 SeaMonkey/2.25 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Dependency conflict. openjpeg ffmpeg References: <539CBD60.6000401@gmail.com> <539CD418.6010206@gmail.com> <539CF4DD.7030708@cox.net> <539D0582.2020407@cox.net> <539D3979.8020405@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <539D3979.8020405@cox.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 13cebd71-8bce-4fae-a95e-2ad8b628919e X-Archives-Hash: 3494cbd9ad73fc674c2af91c433da529 John Campbell wrote: > On 06/14/2014 10:10 PM, Dale wrote: > >> Well, I have 16Gbs here. I'm not lacking for memory. If memory prices >> were to drop a bit, I could upgrade some more. I'd have to swap out >> what I have tho. Old mobo would only take 4GB sticks and this new one >> will take 8GB sticks. > > Unless you have a specific reason for keeping both x32 and 64 ABIs I'd > suggest changing to ABI_X86="32 64" globally in /etc/make.conf (or > /etc/portage/make.conf). It's a lot easier than waiting for the next > conflict. Then do "emerge --new-use --deep @world" and you're done. > There shouldn't bee too many packages that need rebuilding. > > I put that in make.conf and get this: # required by sys-fs/eudev-1.7[gudev] # required by @selected # required by @world (argument) =dev-libs/glib-2.40.0 ~amd64 Does it make sense to keyword that? Isn't that the package that once upgraded you can't go backward? I'm just double checking that this all makes sense. < scratches head > Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!