From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1462F1381FA for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 12:03:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 224B7E0A96; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 12:03:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 059F1E09BE for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 12:03:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.173.147.84] (85-76-37-17-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [85.76.37.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C38333FAD3 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 12:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53905BF5.8010901@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:00:53 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd upower References: <20140603161406.0400709b5f38540475ac4c1f@web.de> <6653474.aQqAYpAeto@wstn> <538DFC41.3080602@libertytrek.org> <538E2CBA.4000709@gmail.com> <538E37A0.1030105@marc-stuermer.de> <538E40E6.8060107@gmail.com> <538E591B.4020708@jsbc.cc> <538E6F1A.2070209@gmx.us> <538E7AEF.9060006@gmx.us> <538E7D21.6090907@mackal.net> <538E81B1.90101@gmx.us> <538E9AF1.3090709@gentoo.org> <538F016E.4090606@admin-box.com> <538F5358.7020607@gmx.us> <538F70C2.1060608@gentoo.org> <538FA88A.2000608@gmx.us> <538FB399.70403@gentoo.org> <539056E5.2020302@gmx.us> In-Reply-To: <539056E5.2020302@gmx.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 2b53b73a-37ff-4712-8a5b-e2b5e651c224 X-Archives-Hash: 045cf2451545540d99af20340e40d88a On 05/06/14 14:39, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > On 06/04/2014 08:02 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> Gentoo doesn't have write access to ::mate-overlay, it's completely >> unofficial >> Gentoo developers are just as much users as you are for ::mate-overlay >> >> Enough said >> >> - Samuli >> >> > Sorry, but this isn't just a MATE overlay problem. Once I made your > suggested changes, the MATE "mask change" requests disappeared. What I > did get was XFCE mask requirements: > > [snip] > > The following mask changes are necessary to proceed: > (see "package.unmask" in the portage(5) man page for more details) > # required by xfce-base/xfce4-meta-4.10 > # required by @selected > # required by @world (argument) > # /etc/portage/package.mask: > # problems with systemd, upower shift to upower.pm.utils > =xfce-base/xfce4-session-4.10.1-r1 > # required by virtual/udev-208-r2 > # required by sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r3 > # required by xfce-base/xfce4-session-4.10.1-r1[udev] > # required by xfce-base/xfce4-meta-4.10 > # required by @selected > # required by @world (argument) > # /etc/portage/package.mask: > # problems with systemd, upower shift to upower.pm.utils > =sys-apps/systemd-212-r5 > # required by sys-apps/systemd-212-r5[-vanilla] > # required by sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r3 > # required by xfce-base/xfce4-session-4.10.1-r1[udev] > # required by xfce-base/xfce4-meta-4.10 > # required by @selected > # required by @world (argument) > # /etc/portage/package.mask: > # problems with systemd, upower shift to upower.pm.utils > =sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration-4 > > [snip] > > I had already 'd those two XFCE applications because, early > in this process an had shown them to be > dependent upon "upower" even after emerging "upower-pm-utils." I have > no confidence at this point that my particular problem is reasonably > solvable, as I have been caught in this circle for three days now. > There is no need to mask any Xfce packages, in fact, masking them would cause more blockers. So that output would be bogus, as it would include the wrong Xfce masks, and futhermore it's only end of the output, so it wouldn't tell the necessary information required for solving it anyway. Remove anykind of Xfce masks and post complete output, and don't forget to use the --tree flag (-t) to see what is pulling in what. That is, if you still want help solving the issue. - Samuli